These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683412)
1. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability. Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction, based on resection margins, of long-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization. Miyoshi Y; Miyatake T; Ueda Y; Morimoto A; Yokoyama T; Matsuzaki S; Kimura T; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Ohashi H; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1427-32. PubMed ID: 22109382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins. Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years. Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Ikeda M; Mikami M; Yasaka M; Enomoto T; Kobayashi Y; Nagase S; Yokoyama M; Katabuchi H J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature. Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses. Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with a long-term follow-up. Yahata T; Nishino K; Kashima K; Sekine M; Fujita K; Sasagawa M; Honma S; Kodama S; Tanaka K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1063-6. PubMed ID: 20683418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma. Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization. Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study. Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management. Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases. Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Kakuda M; Kubota S; Matsuzaki S; Iwamiya T; Okazawa A; Matsuzaki S; Hashimoto K; Kobayashi E; Mabuchi S; Sawada K; Tomimatsu T; Yoshino K; Kimura T Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):921-926. PubMed ID: 28451844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study. Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]