240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683625)
1. Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.
Strube P; Tohtz S; Hoff E; Gross C; Perka C; Putzier M
Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2171-80. PubMed ID: 20683625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment.
Kong C; Lu S; Hai Y; Zang L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 May; 30(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 25779689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.
Untch C; Liu Q; Hart R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2376-81. PubMed ID: 15507798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Effect of L
Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q
Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
