240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683625)
21. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up.
Putzier M; Hoff E; Tohtz S; Gross C; Perka C; Strube P
Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2181-9. PubMed ID: 20632044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Hsu B; Pahl DW; Transfeldt EE
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):807-14. PubMed ID: 19352729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A biomechanical cadaveric study of a modified U-shaped interspinous distraction device.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangpornprasert P; Wangroongsub Y; Itiravivong P; Limpaphayom N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 24979230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.
Gédet P; Haschtmann D; Thistlethwaite PA; Ferguson SJ
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 19565278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanics of a Posterior Lumbar Motion Stabilizing Device: In Vitro Comparison to Intact and Fused Conditions.
Perez-Orribo L; Zucherman JF; Hsu KY; Reyes PM; Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E55-63. PubMed ID: 26335667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The biomechanics of a multilevel lumbar spine hybrid using nucleus replacement in conjunction with fusion.
Dahl MC; Ellingson AM; Mehta HP; Huelman JH; Nuckley DJ
Spine J; 2013 Feb; 13(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 23318109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.
Schilling C; Krüger S; Grupp TM; Duda GN; Blömer W; Rohlmann A
Eur Spine J; 2011 Feb; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 21110209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
