230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20684006)
1. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence interval construction for a difference between two dependent intraclass correlation coefficients.
Ramasundarahettige CF; Donner A; Zou GY
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1041-53. PubMed ID: 19142855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.
Schisterman EF; Faraggi D; Reiser B; Trevisan M
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 154(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 11447052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of the area under the ROC curve.
Faraggi D; Reiser B
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3093-106. PubMed ID: 12369084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Wan S; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero.
Schisterman EF; Reiser B; Faraggi D
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 16345033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-dependent ROC analysis under diverse censoring patterns.
Li J; Ma S
Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1266-77. PubMed ID: 21538452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion.
Reiser B; Faraggi D
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):644-52. PubMed ID: 9235120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.
Janes H; Pepe M
Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):456-68. PubMed ID: 16428259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann-Whitney statistic. Part 1: general issues and tail-area-based methods.
Newcombe RG
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):543-57. PubMed ID: 16252269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ROC area discrimination (ROCAD) curve: a new method of evaluating the discriminating ability of ordinal scales.
Kopec JA; Sayre EC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):997-1003.e1. PubMed ID: 18539430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
