These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2068421)

  • 1. Estimation of reference ranges from normal samples.
    Royston P; Matthews JN
    Stat Med; 1991 May; 10(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 2068421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A statistical method for determining normal ranges from laboratory data including values below the minimum detectable value.
    Tsay JY; Chen IW; Maxon HR; Heminger L
    Clin Chem; 1979 Dec; 25(12):2011-4. PubMed ID: 509699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood P50 calculated from a single measurement of pH, PO2, and SO2.
    Aberman A; Cavanilles JM; Weil MH; Shubin H
    J Appl Physiol; 1975 Jan; 38(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 234122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing time-specific reference ranges.
    Royston P
    Stat Med; 1991 May; 10(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 2068420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges.
    Harris EK; Boyd JC
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2302771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Italian national multicenter study for the definition of reference ranges for normal values of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in healthy adults.
    Santagostino A; Garbaccio G; Pistorio A; Bolis V; Camisasca G; Pagliaro P; Girotto M
    Haematologica; 1999 Jun; 84(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 10366792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two platelet count estimation methodologies for peripheral blood smears.
    Malok M; Titchener EH; Bridgers C; Lee BY; Bamberg R
    Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 17691671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resampling methods in Microsoft Excel® for estimating reference intervals.
    Theodorsson E
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26527366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new approach to sample size calculation for reference interval studies.
    Jennen-Steinmetz C; Wellek S
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3199-212. PubMed ID: 16189809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing against "normal" with environmental data.
    Kilgour BW; Somers KM; Barrett TJ; Munkittrick KR; Francis AP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):188-197. PubMed ID: 26946471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination: extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S59-62. PubMed ID: 1601533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different percentages of false-positive results obtained using five methods for the calculation of reference change values based on simulated normal and ln-normal distributions of data.
    Lund F; Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):692-698. PubMed ID: 27151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-dependent biochemical quantities: an approach for calculating reference intervals.
    Bjerner J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(7):707-22. PubMed ID: 17852817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The underregistration of infant mortality: a new method for its estimation.
    Pelaez G
    Courrier; 1982; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12338816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews.
    Walter SD; Yao X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):849-52. PubMed ID: 17606182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference ranges for fetal ventricular width: a non-normal approach.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 17506037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On the problem of dissociation of statistical distributions deviating from normal values into 2 normal distributions. II. Asymmetric distributions].
    URBAKH VIu
    Biofizika; 1961; 6():265-71. PubMed ID: 13779259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining reference ranges and sample sizes in parallel-group studies.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278447. PubMed ID: 36449490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining a one-tailed upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 16795922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to construct 'normal ranges' for fetal variables.
    Royston P; Wright EM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 11(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.