These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2068425)

  • 1. Comparison of different maximum likelihood estimators in a small sample logistic regression with two independent binary variables.
    Whaley FS
    Stat Med; 1991 May; 10(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 2068425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Small sample estimation of log odds ratios from logistic regression and fourfold tables.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 4089348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of probabilities using the logistic model in retrospective studies.
    Bock JR; Afifi AA
    Comput Biomed Res; 1988 Oct; 21(5):449-70. PubMed ID: 3180745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to initial values in full non-parametric maximum-likelihood estimation of the two-parameter logistic model.
    Nader IW; Tran US; Formann AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):320-36. PubMed ID: 21492136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing bias in parameter estimates from stepwise regression in proportional hazards regression with right-censored data.
    Soh CH; Harrington DP; Zaslavsky AM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Mar; 14(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 18189162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum likelihood regression methods for paired binary data.
    Lipsitz SR; Laird NM; Harrington DP
    Stat Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):1517-25. PubMed ID: 2281239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of several point estimators of the odds ratio in a single 2 x 2 contingency table.
    Walter SD; Cook RJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):795-811. PubMed ID: 1742440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.
    Lyles RH; Guo Y; Greenland S
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2012 Dec; 142(12):3235-3241. PubMed ID: 22962519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
    Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
    van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
    Heinze G; Puhr R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Odds ratios from logistic, geometric, Poisson, and negative binomial regression models.
    Sroka CJ; Nagaraja HN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 30342488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation in regression models for longitudinal binary data with outcome-dependent follow-up.
    Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG; Gelber R; Lipshultz S
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):469-85. PubMed ID: 16428260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum likelihood, multiple imputation and regression calibration for measurement error adjustment.
    Messer K; Natarajan L
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6332-50. PubMed ID: 18937275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two regression methods for estimation of a two-parameter Weibull distribution for reliability of dental materials.
    Bütikofer L; Stawarczyk B; Roos M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):e33-50. PubMed ID: 25499248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.
    Torrance-Rynard VL; Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2157-75. PubMed ID: 9330426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.