These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20684799)

  • 1. On the suitability of SIFT technique to deal with image modifications specific to confocal scanning laser microscopy.
    Stanciu SG; Hristu R; Boriga R; Stanciu GA
    Microsc Microanal; 2010 Oct; 16(5):515-30. PubMed ID: 20684799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of confocal scanning laser microscopy specific acquisition parameters on the detection and matching of speeded-up robust features.
    Stanciu SG; Hristu R; Stanciu GA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Apr; 111(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 21349249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A theory of phase singularities for image representation and its applications to object tracking and image matching.
    Qiao Y; Wang W; Minematsu N; Liu J; Takeda M; Tang X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2153-66. PubMed ID: 19586823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SIFT flow: dense correspondence across scenes and its applications.
    Liu C; Yuen J; Torralba A
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 May; 33(5):978-94. PubMed ID: 20714019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving Retinal Image Quality Using Registration with an SIFT Algorithm in Quasi-Confocal Line Scanning Ophthalmoscope.
    He Y; Wang Y; Wei L; Li X; Yang J; Zhang Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 977():183-190. PubMed ID: 28685444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstruction of volumetric ultrasound panorama based on improved 3D SIFT.
    Ni D; Chui YP; Qu Y; Yang X; Qin J; Wong TT; Ho SS; Heng PA
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Oct; 33(7):559-66. PubMed ID: 19524403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Live-cell tracking using SIFT features in DIC microscopic videos.
    Jiang RM; Crookes D; Luo N; Davidson MW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Sep; 57(9):2219-28. PubMed ID: 20483698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature extraction of chromosomes from 3-D confocal microscope images.
    Kyan MJ; Guan L; Arnison MR; Cogswell CJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1306-18. PubMed ID: 11686629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive image-processing technique and effective visualization of confocal microscopy images.
    Sun Y; Rajwa B; Robinson JP
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Jun; 64(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 15352087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image registration using adaptive polar transform.
    Matungka R; Zheng YF; Ewing RL
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2340-54. PubMed ID: 19520638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo micro-image mosaicing.
    Loewke KE; Camarillo DB; Piyawattanametha W; Mandella MJ; Contag CH; Thrun S; Salisbury JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 20934939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for compensation of the light attenuation with depth of images captured by a confocal microscope.
    Capek M; Janácek J; Kubínová L
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Aug; 69(8):624-35. PubMed ID: 16741977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity correction of fluorescent confocal laser scanning microscope images by mean-weight filtering.
    Lee SC; Bajcsy P
    J Microsc; 2006 Feb; 221(Pt 2):122-36. PubMed ID: 16499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visualization and analysis techniques for three dimensional information acquired by confocal microscopy.
    Brakenhoff GJ; van der Voort HT; Baarslag MW; Mans B; Oud JL; Zwart R; van Driel R
    Scanning Microsc; 1988 Dec; 2(4):1831-8. PubMed ID: 3238377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning microphotolysis: three-dimensional diffusion measurement and optical single-transporter recording.
    Peters R; Kubitscheck U
    Methods; 1999 Aug; 18(4):508-17. PubMed ID: 10491281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alignment of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy photoreceptor images at different polarizations using complex phase relationships.
    Wong A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1831-7. PubMed ID: 19336279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A statistical pixel intensity model for segmentation of confocal laser scanning microscopy images.
    Calapez A; Rosa A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Sep; 19(9):2408-18. PubMed ID: 20363677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image adaptive point-spread function estimation and deconvolution for in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Von Tiedemann M; Fridberger A; Ulfendahl M; Tomo I; Boutet de Monvel J
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Jan; 69(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 16416409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mosaicing of microscope images with global geometric and radiometric corrections.
    Sun C; Beare R; Hilsenstein V; Jackway P
    J Microsc; 2006 Nov; 224(Pt 2):158-65. PubMed ID: 17204063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image processing for precise three-dimensional registration and stitching of thick high-resolution laser-scanning microscopy image stacks.
    Murtin C; Frindel C; Rousseau D; Ito K
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jan; 92():22-41. PubMed ID: 29145044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.