171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20686057)
1. A comparison of conventional guidewire alignment jigs with imageless computer navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Chiu M; Gamble P; Boyle RA; Tumia N; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 20686057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.
Davis ET; Gallie P; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 17463131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a patient specific femoral alignment guide for hip resurfacing.
Olsen M; Naudie DD; Edwards MR; Sellan ME; McCalden RW; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 24034907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.
Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve.
Romanowski JR; Swank ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():65-70. PubMed ID: 18676939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.
Morison Z; Mehra A; Olsen M; Donnelly M; Schemitsch E
Indian J Orthop; 2013 Nov; 47(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 24379464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of navigation in hip resurfacing with different surgeons and varying anatomy.
Schleicher I; Haselbacher M; Mayr E; Kaiser PM; Lenze FW; Keiler A; Nogler M
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 22348660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.
Bailey C; Gul R; Falworth M; Zadow S; Oakeshott R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 18972176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19258604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding short-term femoral neck fracture with imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing.
Olsen M; Schemitsch EH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 469(6):1621-6. PubMed ID: 20936388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer navigated hip resurfacing for patients with abnormal femoral anatomy.
Olsen M; Schemitsch EH
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19583546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K; Mumme T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20476504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.
Schnurr C; Michael JW; Eysel P; König DP
Int Orthop; 2009 Apr; 33(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 18157534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imageless computer navigation without pre-operative templating may lead to malpreparation of the femoral head in hip resurfacing.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Chiu M; Gamble P; Tumia N; Boyle RA; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19794160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing.
Hodgson AJ; Inkpen KB; Shekhman M; Anglin C; Tonetti J; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV
Comput Aided Surg; 2005; 10(5-6):337-43. PubMed ID: 16410236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Christian Wirtz D; Mumme T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Aug; 53(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 18643714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty.
Cobb JP; Kannan V; Brust K; Thevendran G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():90-7. PubMed ID: 17603387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
