220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20686768)
1. Comparative effect of chlorhexidine and some mouthrinses on bacterial biofilm formation on titanium surface.
Baffone W; Sorgente G; Campana R; Patrone V; Sisti D; Falcioni T
Curr Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 62(2):445-51. PubMed ID: 20686768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of chlorhexidine, listerine and fluoride listerine mouthrinses on four putative root-caries pathogens in the biofilm.
Zheng CY; Wang ZH
Chin J Dent Res; 2011; 14(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22319755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Plaque bacteria counts and vitality during chlorhexidine, meridol and listerine mouthrinses.
Netuschil L; Weiger R; Preisler R; Brecx M
Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Dec; 103(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 8747670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mouthrinses: a comparative microbiological study.
Gautier G; Noguer M; Costa N; Canela J; Viñas M
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2000; 42(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11799736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antimicrobials Influence Bond Stiffness and Detachment of Oral Bacteria.
Song L; Hou J; van der Mei HC; Veeregowda DH; Busscher HJ; Sjollema J
J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 26921277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial efficacy of non-thermal plasma in comparison to chlorhexidine against dental biofilms on titanium discs in vitro - proof of principle experiment.
Koban I; Holtfreter B; Hübner NO; Matthes R; Sietmann R; Kindel E; Weltmann KD; Welk A; Kramer A; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Oct; 38(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 21762196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences between single- and dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvula in growth, acidogenicity and susceptibility to chlorhexidine.
Kara D; Luppens SB; Cate JM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Feb; 114(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 16460342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative in vitro evaluation of efficacy of mouthrinses against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli and Candida albicans.
Malhotra N; Rao SP; Acharya S; Vasudev B
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2011; 9(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 22068182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine digluconate against Streptococcus mutans biofilms follows sigmoidal patterns.
Lee DW; Jung JE; Yang YM; Kim JG; Yi HK; Jeon JG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Oct; 124(5):440-446. PubMed ID: 27349190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofilm formation in Haas palatal expanders with and without use of an antimicrobial agent: an in situ study.
Bagatin CR; Andrucioli MCD; Ferreira JTL; Matsumoto MAN; da Silva RAB; da Silva LAB; Romano FL; Nelson-Filho P
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 May; 80(5):471-477. PubMed ID: 27935660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
Shapiro S; Giertsen E; Guggenheim B
Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 12037365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of xylitol/chlorhexidine versus xylitol or chlorhexidine as single rinses on initial biofilm formation of cariogenic streptococci.
Decker EM; Maier G; Axmann D; Brecx M; von Ohle C
Quintessence Int; 2008 Jan; 39(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18551212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a mouthrinse containing Malva sylvestris on the viability and activity of microcosm biofilm and on enamel demineralization compared to known antimicrobials mouthrinses.
Braga AS; Pires JG; Magalhães AC
Biofouling; 2018 Mar; 34(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29430962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Schönbächler N; Thurnheer T; Paqué PN; Attin T; Karygianni L
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1130255. PubMed ID: 36798085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinses on polyspecies biofilms.
Guggenheim B; Meier A
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2011; 121(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 21656386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
Pan PC; Harper S; Ricci-Nittel D; Lux R; Shi W
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-20. PubMed ID: 20621239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro.
Chen Y; Wong RW; Seneviratne CJ; Hägg U; McGrath C; Samaranayake LP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 21967942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. S. mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization.
Ccahuana-Vásquez RA; Cury JA
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20658029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-Velocity Microsprays Enhance Antimicrobial Activity in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms.
Fabbri S; Johnston DA; Rmaile A; Gottenbos B; De Jager M; Aspiras M; Starke EM; Ward MT; Stoodley P
J Dent Res; 2016 Dec; 95(13):1494-1500. PubMed ID: 27554642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Penetration kinetics of four mouthrinses into Streptococcus mutans biofilms analyzed by direct time-lapse visualization.
Wakamatsu R; Takenaka S; Ohsumi T; Terao Y; Ohshima H; Okiji T
Clin Oral Investig; 2014; 18(2):625-34. PubMed ID: 23716063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
