125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20686927)
1. Automatic breast parenchymal density classification integrated into a CADe system.
Bueno G; Vállez N; Déniz O; Esteve P; Rienda MA; Arias M; Pastor C
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 May; 6(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 20686927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems.
Vállez N; Bueno G; Déniz O; Dorado J; Seoane JA; Pazos A; Pastor C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):569-84. PubMed ID: 24286729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiclass primal support vector machines for breast density classification.
Land WH; Verheggen EA
Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2009; 2(1):21-57. PubMed ID: 20054985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An automatic mass detection system in mammograms based on complex texture features.
Tai SC; Chen ZS; Tsai WT
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Mar; 18(2):618-27. PubMed ID: 24608061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions.
Obenauer S; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Munzel U; Baum F; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1697-702. PubMed ID: 12111060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis.
Petrosian A; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2273-88. PubMed ID: 15551553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms: A fully automated computer-aided system.
Basile TMA; Fanizzi A; Losurdo L; Bellotti R; Bottigli U; Dentamaro R; Didonna V; Fausto A; Massafra R; Moschetta M; Tamborra P; Tangaro S; La Forgia D
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():1-9. PubMed ID: 31515007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography.
Lesniak JM; Hupse R; Blanc R; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5295-307. PubMed ID: 22853938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns.
Tahoces PG; Correa J; Souto M; Gómez L; Vidal JJ
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jan; 40(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 7708834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis.
Gowri V; Valluvan KR; Chamundeeswari VV
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3093-3098. PubMed ID: 30486547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
