202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20687120)
1. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
Soliman S; Resnick PJ
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):614-29. PubMed ID: 20687120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feigned Adjudicative Incompetence.
Rogers R; Robinson EV; Henry SA
Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 26384736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.
Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
Soulier M
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five year research update (1996-2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
Mumley DL; Tillbrook CE; Grisso T
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):329-50. PubMed ID: 12808694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures.
Rogers R; Sewell KW; Grandjean NR; Vitacco MJ
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12056080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried ED; Hudson BL; Vitacco MJ; Carbonell JL
Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):232-243. PubMed ID: 26423350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
Fogel MH; Schiffman W; Mumley D; Tillbrook C; Grisso T
Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):165-91. PubMed ID: 23348511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT).
Denney RL; Thinda S; Finn PM; Fazio RL; Chen MJ; Walsh MR
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Mar; 46(2):124-140. PubMed ID: 38346168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Literature Analysis of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge.
Danzer GS; Wasser TD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Mar; 49(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 33234539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial.
Rogers R; Jackson RL; Sewell KW; Harrison KS
Psychol Assess; 2004 Jun; 16(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 15222810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preadolescent adjudicative competence: methodological considerations and recommendations for practice standards.
Oberlander LB; Goldstein NE; Ho CN
Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 11568960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults.
Redlich AD; Silverman M; Steiner H
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 12808697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying persons feigning limitations in their competence to proceed in the legal process.
Guenther CC; Otto RK
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 20842642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Future orientation and competence to stand trial: the fragility of competence.
Kivisto AJ; Moore TM; Fite PA; Seidner BG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):316-26. PubMed ID: 21908747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: a practical conceptual model.
Kirkish P; Sreenivasan S
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 10212030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
