396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20687187)
1. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: 2010.
Margolies L
Mt Sinai J Med; 2010; 77(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 20687187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Aragon R; Morgan J; Wong JH; Lum S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician knowledge of and adherence to the revised breast cancer screening guidelines by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.
Hinz EK; Kudesia R; Rolston R; Caputo TA; Worley MJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):201.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21689807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
Shen N; Hammonds LS; Madsen D; Dale P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.
Anderson BL; Pearlman M; Griffin J; Schulkin J
J Healthc Qual; 2013; 35(4):25-35. PubMed ID: 23590634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography.
Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23290669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.
Squiers LB; Holden DJ; Dolina SE; Kim AE; Bann CM; Renaud JM
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 21496748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening in Denmark.
Vejborg I; Mikkelsen E; Garne JP; Bak M; Lernevall A; Mogensen NB; Schwartz W; Lynge E
Dan Med Bull; 2011 Jun; 58(6):C4287. PubMed ID: 21651881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's primary care providers and breast cancer screening: who's following the guidelines?
Wallace AE; MacKenzie TA; Weeks WB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):744-8. PubMed ID: 16522407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The recent US preventive services task force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence and should be rescinded.
Kopans DB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 20362940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation.
Howard DH; Adams EK
Prev Med; 2012 Nov; 55(5):485-7. PubMed ID: 23000441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uptake of breast cancer screening in women aged over 75 years: a controversy to come?
Eisinger F; Viguier J; Blay JY; Morère JF; Coscas Y; Roussel C; Pivot X
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S13-5. PubMed ID: 21245673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary care providers' concerns and recommendations regarding mammography screening for older women.
Sharp PC; Michielutte R; Spangler JG; Cunningham L; Freimanis R
J Cancer Educ; 2005; 20(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15876180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS
CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of physician and patient characteristics on adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations.
Abdel-Malek N; Chiarelli AM; Sloan M; Stewart DE; Mai V; Howlett RI
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Feb; 17(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 18090910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
