These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20687434)

  • 1. The 30th anniversary of the triple tray! Interview by Damon Adams.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2010 Jul; 29(7):104, 106-7. PubMed ID: 20687434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth.
    Lee H; Park C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impression tips to reduce stress and increase profits: a doctor-technician liaison's perspective.
    Adams DC
    Dent Today; 2006 Oct; 25(10):104, 106. PubMed ID: 17058397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impression technique. Review of survey findings.
    LaMond GG
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):88-91. PubMed ID: 12242840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple and functional--an impression method for the distal extension RPD.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Jun; 21(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 19663052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-visit, complete-denture technique utilizing visible light-cured resin for tray and base plate construction.
    Ling BC
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15119715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fabricating a simple closure guide for the dual-arch impression technique.
    Keesee SM; Cameron SM; Lefler TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):418. PubMed ID: 11319543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jaw relation records for fixed prosthodontics.
    Squier RS
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vii, 471-86. PubMed ID: 15172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Special tray design questioned.
    Walter JD
    Br Dent J; 1999 Dec; 187(11):578; author reply 578. PubMed ID: 16163273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The determination of the area and closeness of the fit of the dental arches].
    Riakhovskiĭ AN
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1992; (2):62-4. PubMed ID: 1412551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.