These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20688422)

  • 41. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Irrelevant tapping and the acoustic confusion effect: the effect of spatial complexity.
    Guérard K; Jalbert A; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Bireta TJ
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 19447753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Frequency-dependent changes in absolute hearing threshold caused by perception of a previous sound.
    Yoshida J; Hasegawa H; Kasuga M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL62. PubMed ID: 17927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory discrimination of voice-onset time and its relationship with reading ability.
    Arciuli J; Rankine T; Monaghan P
    Laterality; 2010 May; 15(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 19343572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lateral response dynamics and hemispheric dominance for speech perception.
    Hunter MD; Lee KH; Tandon P; Parks RW; Wilkinson ID; Woodruff PW
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 17632286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of broadband noise on serial memory: changes in band-pass frequency increase disruption.
    Tremblay S; Macken WJ; Jones DM
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):323-31. PubMed ID: 11594355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech?
    Shtyrov Y; Pihko E; Pulvermüller F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16023039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Long-term exposure to noise impairs cortical sound processing and attention control.
    Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Winkler I; Saher M; Tervaniemi M; Sallinen M; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Nov; 41(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 15563340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Activation of human auditory cortex during speech perception: effects of monaural, binaural, and dichotic presentation.
    Stefanatos GA; Joe WQ; Aguirre GK; Detre JA; Wetmore G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):301-15. PubMed ID: 18023460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Congruency, attentional set, and laterality effects with emotional words.
    Techentin C; Voyer D
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Sep; 21(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 17784812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Age effects in identifying and localising dichotic stimuli: a corpus callosum deficit?
    Gootjes L; Van Strien JW; Bouma A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):826-37. PubMed ID: 15370378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Blind individuals show enhanced perceptual and attentional sensitivity for identification of speech sounds.
    Hugdahl K; Ek M; Takio F; Rintee T; Tuomainen J; Haarala C; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 14972355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
    Hall D; Gathercole SE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
    Farrand P; Jones D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.
    Vachon F; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 21895389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Forced-Attention Dichotic Listening With University Students With Dyslexia: Search for a Core Deficit.
    Kershner JR
    J Learn Disabil; 2016; 49(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 25139934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.