These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20689028)

  • 1. Assessing multimodal spoken word-in-sentence recognition in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Holt RF; Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):632-57. PubMed ID: 20689028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.
    Kaiser AR; Kirk KI; Lachs L; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 46(2):390-404. PubMed ID: 14700380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Wang NM; Wu CM; Kirk KI
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 20846499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual sentence repetition as a clinical criterion for auditory development in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Rahimi Z; Mayahi A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():167-171. PubMed ID: 28109491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic and semantic enhancements for children with cochlear implants.
    Smiljanic R; Sladen D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1085-96. PubMed ID: 23785186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deaf children with cochlear implants do not appear to use sentence context to help recognize spoken words.
    Conway CM; Deocampo JA; Walk AM; Anaya EM; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2174-90. PubMed ID: 25029170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual spoken word recognition as a clinical criterion for sensory aids efficiency in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Bazrafkan M; Haghjoo A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2424-7. PubMed ID: 26607564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.
    Lachs L; Pisoni DB; Kirk KI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):236-51. PubMed ID: 11409859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Osberger MJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):470-81. PubMed ID: 8654902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.
    King SE; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Strube M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):313-31. PubMed ID: 22533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
    Sommers MS; Kirk KI; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
    Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Amichetti NM; Atagi E; Kong YY; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 28700448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.