These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2068907)

  • 1. Noise and medial olivocochlear system in humans.
    Collet L; Morgon A; Veuillet E; Gartner M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 2068907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of contralateral white noise on click-evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Collet L; Veuillet E; Bene J; Morgon A
    Audiology; 1992; 31(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1554329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of otoacoustic emissions to explore the medial olivocochlear system in humans.
    Collet L
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Apr; 27(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 8220283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans.
    Veuillet E; Martin V; Suc B; Vesson JF; Morgon A; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 11349796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Reshef I; Attias J; Furst M
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 8054896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
    Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
    Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP
    HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.
    Maison SF; Liberman MC
    J Neurosci; 2000 Jun; 20(12):4701-7. PubMed ID: 10844039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the noise-protective action of the olivocochlear efferents in humans.
    Wolpert S; Heyd A; Wagner W
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 24281009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does hyperandrogenism affect the otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear reflex in female adults?
    Eren E; Harman E; Arslanoğlu S; Önal K; Katlmiş H
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 23770686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Kuehn M; Tisch M; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):2021-8. PubMed ID: 16319617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):89-98. PubMed ID: 9387988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.
    Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additivity of loud-sound--induced threshold losses in the cat under conditions of active or inactive cochlear efferent-mediated protection.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1601-18. PubMed ID: 8727399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of an age-related hearing loss gene (Ahl) on noise-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage from low-frequency noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA; Vos JD
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15925194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1604-10. PubMed ID: 8819856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) latency shifts in animal models of various types of conductive and sensori-neural hearing losses.
    Sohmer H; Freeman S; Friedman I; Lidan D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 2068903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.