These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2068911)

  • 1. What is the cochlear place code for pitch?
    Zwislocki JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 2068911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear precursors of neural pitch and loudness codes.
    Zwislocki JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():12-5. PubMed ID: 7668600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Place code for pitch: a necessary revision.
    Zwislocki JJ; Nguyen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10320063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Growth of suppression in the cochlear potentials.
    Cheatham MA
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2995299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. II. Single- and two-tone intensity functions in relation to tuning curves.
    Schmiedt RA; Zwislocki JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 43(5):1390-405. PubMed ID: 7373369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing cochlear mechano-electric transduction with a nonlinear system identification technique: the influence of the middle ear.
    Choi CH; Chertoff ME; Yi X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2898-909. PubMed ID: 12509011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch.
    Chatterjee M; Zwislocki JJ
    Hear Res; 1997 Sep; 111(1-2):65-75. PubMed ID: 9307312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two-tone inhibition, and responses to trapezoidal-wave patterns.
    Schmiedt RA; Zwislocki JJ; Hamernik RP
    J Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 43(5):1367-89. PubMed ID: 7373368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model.
    Furst M; Reshef I; Attias J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1003-14. PubMed ID: 1313463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-frequency acoustic modulations generated by the high-frequency portion of the cochlea, noninvasively recorded from the scalp of mice (Mus musculus).
    Henry KR
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 10739309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphology, synaptology and electrophysiology of the developing cochlea.
    Pujol R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985; 421():5-9. PubMed ID: 3862330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of current stimulus on in vivo cochlear mechanics.
    Parthasarathi AA; Grosh K; Zheng J; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):442-52. PubMed ID: 12558281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants.
    Moore BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Mar; 24(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 12621339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the overload effect of sound impulses to the inner ear.
    Wagner H; Berndt H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 232(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7271587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear potentials in the Bronx waltzer mutant mouse.
    Bock GR; Yates GK; Deol MS
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Dec; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 6298667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental changes in frequency mapping of the gerbil cochlea: comparison of two cochlear locations.
    Arjmand E; Harris D; Dallos P
    Hear Res; 1988 Jan; 32(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 3350777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study on the effect of pure-tone exposure of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hotta S; Sugisawa T; Itoh T; Hasebe M; Yamamura K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1996; 253(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 8932430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.
    Puria S; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):287-309. PubMed ID: 2002170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a compressive nonlinearity in a cochlear model.
    Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):257-60. PubMed ID: 2991354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.