BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20689309)

  • 1. Fast and robust association tests for untyped SNPs in case-control studies.
    Allen AS; Satten GA; Bray SL; Dudbridge F; Epstein MP
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 20689309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ATRIUM: testing untyped SNPs in case-control association studies with related individuals.
    Wang Z; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 19913122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of untyped SNPs: maximum likelihood and imputation methods.
    Hu YJ; Lin DY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):803-15. PubMed ID: 21104886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using imputed genotype data in the joint score tests for genetic association and gene-environment interactions in case-control studies.
    Song M; Wheeler W; Caporaso NE; Landi MT; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 42(2):146-155. PubMed ID: 29178451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing untyped alleles (TUNA)-applications to genome-wide association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):718-27. PubMed ID: 16986160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing power of genome-wide association studies by collecting additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Kostem E; Lozano JA; Eskin E
    Genetics; 2011 Jun; 188(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21467568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association studies for untyped markers with TUNA.
    Wen X; Nicolae DL
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):435-7. PubMed ID: 18057020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jackknife-based gene-gene interactiontests for untyped SNPs.
    Song M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 26187382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes.
    Li Y; Willer CJ; Ding J; Scheet P; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):816-34. PubMed ID: 21058334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HapBoost: a fast approach to boosting haplotype association analyses in genome-wide association studies.
    Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Zhao H; Yu W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 23702557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and accurate imputation of summary statistics enhances evidence of functional enrichment.
    Pasaniuc B; Zaitlen N; Shi H; Bhatia G; Gusev A; Pickrell J; Hirschhorn J; Strachan DP; Patterson N; Price AL
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(20):2906-14. PubMed ID: 24990607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hidden Markov random field model for genome-wide association studies.
    Li H; Wei Z; Maris J
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 19822692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate Imputation of Untyped Variants from Deep Sequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2243():271-281. PubMed ID: 33606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient identification of identical-by-descent status in pedigrees with many untyped individuals.
    Li X; Yin X; Li J
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i191-8. PubMed ID: 20529905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of weighted reference panels based on empirical estimates of ancestry for capturing untyped variation.
    Egyud MR; Gajdos ZK; Butler JL; Tischfield S; Le Marchand L; Kolonel LN; Haiman CA; Henderson BE; Hirschhorn JN
    Hum Genet; 2009 Apr; 125(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 19184111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing accuracy of genotype imputation in American Indians.
    Malhotra A; Kobes S; Bogardus C; Knowler WC; Baier LJ; Hanson RL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102544. PubMed ID: 25014012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of vicinity-based hidden Markov models for genotype imputation.
    Wang S; Kim M; Jiang X; Harmanci AO
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):356. PubMed ID: 36038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well do HapMap SNPs capture the untyped SNPs?
    Tantoso E; Yang Y; Li KB
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Sep; 7():238. PubMed ID: 16982009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.
    Wason JM; Dudbridge F
    BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():80. PubMed ID: 20828390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip.
    Spencer CC; Su Z; Donnelly P; Marchini J
    PLoS Genet; 2009 May; 5(5):e1000477. PubMed ID: 19492015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.