These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20689520)

  • 1. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2010 Aug; 5(8):553. PubMed ID: 20689520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery".
    Orbay H; Sensöz O
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):579-80; author reply 580-1. PubMed ID: 16874271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cancer of bureaucracy: how it will destroy science, medicine, education; and eventually everything else.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2010 Jun; 74(6):961-5. PubMed ID: 20071103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peering into the Future of Peer Review.
    Parsi K; Elster N
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 May; 18(5):3-4. PubMed ID: 29697347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimizing bias in clinical peer review.
    Edwards MT
    Physician Exec; 2011; 37(6):50-2, 54. PubMed ID: 22195417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Funding should recognize the value of peer review.
    Dominiczak MH
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):111. PubMed ID: 12520276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Further development of peer-review-procedures in medical rehabilitation].
    Farin E; Carl C; Jäckel WH; Rütten-Köppel E; Maier-Riehle B; Berghaus U
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Jun; 43(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 15202040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No evidence of sexism in peer review.
    Grant J; Burden S; Breen G
    Nature; 1997 Dec; 390(6659):438. PubMed ID: 9393992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From collegial to codified. The evolution of modern peer review.
    Watts C
    Tex Med; 1995 Sep; 91(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 7570381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The limits and power of peer review.
    Hammerschmidt DE; Franklin M
    Minn Med; 2006 Jun; 89(6):43-5. PubMed ID: 16846184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review.
    Trostorff DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review in Virginia.
    Morton RA
    Va Med; 1986 Oct; 113(10):584-6. PubMed ID: 3788264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review: still tilting at windmills.
    Schorr B
    Physicians Manage; 1987 Oct; 27(10):124-6, 128, 133. PubMed ID: 10302231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trouble with peer review.
    Rocha B
    Nat Immunol; 2001 Apr; 2(4):277. PubMed ID: 11276191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ups and downs of peer review.
    Benos DJ; Bashari E; Chaves JM; Gaggar A; Kapoor N; LaFrance M; Mans R; Mayhew D; McGowan S; Polter A; Qadri Y; Sarfare S; Schultz K; Splittgerber R; Stephenson J; Tower C; Walton RG; Zotov A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17562902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review in Minnesota--the Foundation for Health Care Evaluation-1985.
    Woellner RC
    Minn Med; 1985 Jun; 68(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 4040600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A physician's perspective of peer review.
    Nelson AR
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):15-6. PubMed ID: 10278602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician peer review in New Jersey.
    Dwyer WA
    N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2710420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.