These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20690126)

  • 1. Examining the phonological neighborhood density effect using near infrared spectroscopy.
    Chen HC; Vaid J; Boas DA; Bortfeld H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1363-70. PubMed ID: 20690126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word recognition with the N400: Evidence for semantic scaffolding.
    Yates M; Shelley-Tremblay J; Knapp DL
    Brain Lang; 2020 Dec; 211():104866. PubMed ID: 33074109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similarity relations among spoken words: the special status of rimes in English.
    De Cara B; Goswami U
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 12395558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.
    Suárez L; Tan SH; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):605-11. PubMed ID: 21380585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.
    Vitevitch MS
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 17533890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken-word recognition.
    Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):226-38. PubMed ID: 19806483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.
    Chan KY; Vitevitch MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1934-49. PubMed ID: 19968444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural basis of inhibitory effects of semantic and phonological neighbors in spoken word production.
    Mirman D; Graziano KM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 25(9):1504-16. PubMed ID: 23647518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks.
    Yates M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1385-1397. PubMed ID: 16393053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Network Science and Psycholinguistic Megastudies to Examine the Dimensions of Phonological Similarity.
    Castro N; Vitevitch MS
    Lang Speech; 2023 Mar; 66(1):143-174. PubMed ID: 35586894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: evidence from dual-site TMS.
    Hartwigsen G; Price CJ; Baumgaertner A; Geiss G; Koehnke M; Ulmer S; Siebner HR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3155-63. PubMed ID: 20600177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the clustering of phonological neighbors affects visual word recognition.
    Yates M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1649-56. PubMed ID: 23565783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: an fMRI study.
    Newman RL; Joanisse MF
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():250-64. PubMed ID: 20888806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. WordPars: A tool for orthographic and phonological neighborhood and other psycholinguistic statistics in Persian.
    Esmaeelpour E; Saneei S; Nourbakhsh M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1902-1911. PubMed ID: 34755284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of orthography in the semantic activation of neighbors.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Taylor TE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1259-73. PubMed ID: 22545607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition.
    Siew CS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):496-502. PubMed ID: 27383618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in spelling ability influence phonological processing during visual word recognition.
    Yates M; Slattery TJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():139-149. PubMed ID: 30875660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological neighbors influence word naming through the least supported phoneme.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1599-608. PubMed ID: 19045995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An event-related potential study of the relationship between N170 lateralization and phonological awareness in developing readers.
    Sacchi E; Laszlo S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():415-425. PubMed ID: 27614290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.