275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20690851)
1. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits.
Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; Souza FÁ; Guastaldi AC; Margonar R; Garcia-Júnior IR; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 22540325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thin bioactive ceramic-coated alumina-blasted/acid-etched implant surface enhances biomechanical fixation of implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Granato R; Marin C; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Dodson TB; Suzuki M; Coelho PG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19681928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of removal torques for laser-treated titanium implants with anodized implants.
Kang SH; Cho SA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1491-5. PubMed ID: 21778844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nondecalcified histologic study of bone response to titanium implants topographically modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating.
Sisti KE; Piattelli A; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; de Rossi R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 23998165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in rabbit cortical bone using longitudinal and transverse histologic sections.
Rebollal J; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20386217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
