These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20691109)

  • 1. Evaluation of high-resolution microarray platforms for genomic profiling of bone tumours.
    Kresse SH; Szuhai K; Barragan-Polania AH; Rydbeck H; Cleton-Jansen AM; Myklebost O; Meza-Zepeda LA
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 Aug; 3():223. PubMed ID: 20691109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed.
    Curtis C; Lynch AG; Dunning MJ; Spiteri I; Marioni JC; Hadfield J; Chin SF; Brenton JD; Tavaré S; Caldas C
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Dec; 10():588. PubMed ID: 19995423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Agilent, ROMA/NimbleGen and Illumina platforms for classification of copy number alterations in human breast tumors.
    Baumbusch LO; Aarøe J; Johansen FE; Hicks J; Sun H; Bruhn L; Gunderson K; Naume B; Kristensen VN; Liestøl K; Børresen-Dale AL; Lingjaerde OC
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Aug; 9():379. PubMed ID: 18691401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for copy-number alterations and loss of heterozygosity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia--a comparative study of four differently designed, high resolution microarray platforms.
    Gunnarsson R; Staaf J; Jansson M; Ottesen AM; Göransson H; Liljedahl U; Ralfkiaer U; Mansouri M; Buhl AM; Smedby KE; Hjalgrim H; Syvänen AC; Borg A; Isaksson A; Jurlander J; Juliusson G; Rosenquist R
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Aug; 47(8):697-711. PubMed ID: 18484635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation.
    Tucker T; Montpetit A; Chai D; Chan S; Chénier S; Coe BP; Delaney A; Eydoux P; Lam WL; Langlois S; Lemyre E; Marra M; Qian H; Rouleau GA; Vincent D; Michaud JL; Friedman JM
    BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Mar; 4():25. PubMed ID: 21439053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis in humans.
    Haraksingh RR; Abyzov A; Urban AE
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28438122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of ultra-dense array CGH analysis for the discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome.
    Przybytkowski E; Ferrario C; Basik M
    BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Jan; 4():16. PubMed ID: 21272361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of Affymetrix Arrays in the Diagnosis of Gene Copy-Number Variation.
    Zahir FR; Marra MA
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2015 Apr; 85():8.13.1-8.13.13. PubMed ID: 25827348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.
    Pollack JR; Perou CM; Alizadeh AA; Eisen MB; Pergamenschikov A; Williams CF; Jeffrey SS; Botstein D; Brown PO
    Nat Genet; 1999 Sep; 23(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10471496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Density matters: comparison of array platforms for detection of copy-number variation and copy-neutral abnormalities.
    Mason-Suares H; Kim W; Grimmett L; Williams ES; Horner VL; Kunig D; Goldlust IS; Wu BL; Shen Y; Miller DT; Martin CL; Rudd MK
    Genet Med; 2013 Sep; 15(9):706-12. PubMed ID: 23558256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-wide copy number profiling on high-density bacterial artificial chromosomes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and oligonucleotide microarrays: a platform comparison based on statistical power analysis.
    Hehir-Kwa JY; Egmont-Petersen M; Janssen IM; Smeets D; van Kessel AG; Veltman JA
    DNA Res; 2007 Feb; 14(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17363414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of Nexus copy number software for CNV detection and analysis.
    Darvishi K
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2010 Apr; Chapter 4():Unit 4.14.1-28. PubMed ID: 20373515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CGH arrays compared for DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material.
    Krijgsman O; Israeli D; Haan JC; van Essen HF; Smeets SJ; Eijk PP; Steenbergen RD; Kok K; Tejpar S; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2012 Apr; 51(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 22162309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multicenter, cross-platform clinical validation study of cancer cytogenomic arrays.
    Li MM; Monzon FA; Biegel JA; Jobanputra V; Laffin JJ; Levy B; Leon A; Miron P; Rossi MR; Toruner G; Alvarez K; Doho G; Dougherty MJ; Hu X; Kash S; Streck D; Znoyko I; Hagenkord JM; Wolff DJ
    Cancer Genet; 2015 Nov; 208(11):525-36. PubMed ID: 26454669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of submicroscopic constitutional chromosome aberrations in clinical diagnostics: a validation of the practical performance of different array platforms.
    Zhang ZF; Ruivenkamp C; Staaf J; Zhu H; Barbaro M; Petillo D; Khoo SK; Borg A; Fan YS; Schoumans J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 16(7):786-92. PubMed ID: 18285835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
    Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment.
    Halper-Stromberg E; Frelin L; Ruczinski I; Scharpf R; Jie C; Carvalho B; Hao H; Hetrick K; Jedlicka A; Dziedzic A; Doheny K; Scott AF; Baylin S; Pevsner J; Spencer F; Irizarry RA
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Apr; 27(8):1052-60. PubMed ID: 21478196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization technologies across microarray platforms.
    Hester SD; Reid L; Nowak N; Jones WD; Parker JS; Knudtson K; Ward W; Tiesman J; Denslow ND
    J Biomol Tech; 2009 Apr; 20(2):135-51. PubMed ID: 19503625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SNP arrays: comparing diagnostic yields for four platforms in children with developmental delay.
    D'Amours G; Langlois M; Mathonnet G; Fetni R; Nizard S; Srour M; Tihy F; Phillips MS; Michaud JL; Lemyre E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Dec; 7():70. PubMed ID: 25539807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.