These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20691334)

  • 1. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages.
    van Dijken JW; Hasselrot L
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):929-39. PubMed ID: 20691334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW; Hasselrot L; Ormin A; Olofsson AL
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2001 Aug; 109(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 11531067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain onlays: a 4-year report.
    Barghi N; Berry TG
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jul; 23(7):657-60, 662, 664 passim; quiz 674. PubMed ID: 12789976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
    Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Posterior ceramic bonded partial restorations].
    Mainjot A; Vanheusden A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2006; 61(2):77-95. PubMed ID: 17432532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
    Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding of lithium-disilicate ceramic to enamel and dentin using orthotropic fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Ergun G; Cekic I; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Oct; 64(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 16945895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R; Pelka M; Petschelt A
    J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 10377606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2001 Apr; 14(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11507807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.