These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2069181)

  • 1. Evaluating tactile aids for speech perception and production by hearing-impaired adults and children.
    Weisenberger JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():188-200. PubMed ID: 2069181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a tactile aid and a cochlear implant in one child.
    Hesketh LJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Osberger MJ
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():183-7. PubMed ID: 2069180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech teaching for deaf children in the age of bilingual/bicultural programs: the role of tactile aids.
    Plant G; Horan M; Reed H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():19-23. PubMed ID: 9428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial findings with a wearable multichannel vibrotactile aid.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Todd SL; Brown CJ
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():179-82. PubMed ID: 2069179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiological rehabilitation with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
    Osberger MJ
    ASHA; 1990 Apr; 32(4):38-43. PubMed ID: 2139781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved electrotactile speech processor: Tickle Talker.
    Cowan RS; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Millard R; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():454-6. PubMed ID: 7668750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of speech perception in children with cochlear implants and tactile aids: what should the future hold?
    Carney AE
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():201-4. PubMed ID: 2069182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hand held two-channel vibro-tactile speech communication aid for the deaf: characteristics and results.
    Spens KE; Huss C; Dahlqvist M; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():7-13. PubMed ID: 9428037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Speech perception test in Italian language for profoundly deaf children].
    Genovese E; Orzan E; Turrini M; Babighian G; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Oct; 15(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 8721729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The test for the evaluation speech perception and production].
    Vieu A; Mondain M; Sillon M; Piron JP; Uziel A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 10668355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Requirements on speech processing hearing aids for the profoundly deaf, some preliminary remarks.
    Risberg A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):179-98. PubMed ID: 292142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.