These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2069189)

  • 1. Signal processing for sensory aids: a unified view.
    Levitt H
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():52-5. PubMed ID: 2069189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Requirements on speech processing hearing aids for the profoundly deaf, some preliminary remarks.
    Risberg A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):179-98. PubMed ID: 292142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech communication for the deaf: visual, tactile, and cochlear-implant.
    Pickett JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 2420984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiological rehabilitation with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
    Osberger MJ
    ASHA; 1990 Apr; 32(4):38-43. PubMed ID: 2139781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of visual and tactile sensory aids in speech production training: a preliminary report.
    McGarr NS; Head J; Friedman M; Behrman AM; Youdelman K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 2420983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment.
    Boothroyd A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 46():17-25. PubMed ID: 9309834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and a tactile device.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():339-41. PubMed ID: 7668697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles of automatic processing of speech signals and their application in medical technology and for aids for handicapped.
    Mangold H
    Med Prog Technol; 1988; 14(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 2976877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal processing for hearing impairment.
    Levitt H; Bakke M; Kates J; Neuman A; Schwander T; Weiss M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():7-19. PubMed ID: 8153567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of tactile aids.
    Summers I
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 2790314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved electrotactile speech processor: Tickle Talker.
    Cowan RS; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Millard R; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():454-6. PubMed ID: 7668750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment techniques to evaluate tactual aids for hearing-impaired subjects.
    Eilers RE; Widen JE; Oller DK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(2):33-46. PubMed ID: 3361459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuing evaluation of the Queen's University tactile vocoder. I: Identification of open set words.
    Brooks PL; Frost BJ; Mason JL; Gibson DM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 3958993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.