These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20693011)

  • 1. In vitro cytotoxicity testing of metal alloys used in medicine: Comparison of different approaches.
    Cervinka M; Půza V; Hroch M; Cervinková Z
    Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):783-5. PubMed ID: 20693011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic archwires in cortical cell cultures.
    David A; Lobner D
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Aug; 26(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 15366387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility of fixation materials in the brain.
    Mofid MM; Thompson RC; Pardo CA; Manson PN; Vander Kolk CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jul; 100(1):14-20; discussion 21-2. PubMed ID: 9207654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioaccessibility studies of ferro-chromium alloy particles for a simulated inhalation scenario: a comparative study with the pure metals and stainless steel.
    Midander K; de Frutos A; Hedberg Y; Darrie G; Wallinder IO
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):441-55. PubMed ID: 20821706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
    Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.
    Filli L; Luechinger R; Frauenfelder T; Beck S; Guggenberger R; Farshad-Amacker N; Andreisek G
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 25417003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accelerated toxicity testing of casting alloys and reduction of intraoral release of elements.
    Nelson SK; Wataha JC; Lockwood PE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):715-20. PubMed ID: 10347361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of two materials for dynamic hip screw during fall and gait loading: titanium alloy and stainless steel.
    Taheri NS; Blicblau AS; Singh M
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Nov; 16(6):805-13. PubMed ID: 21877191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytotoxicity of dental casting alloys pretreated with biologic solutions.
    Nelson SK; Wataha JC; Neme AM; Cibirka RM; Lockwood PE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 10220665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Release of nickel ions from stainless steel alloys used in dental braces and their patch test reactivity in nickel-sensitive individuals.
    Jensen CS; Lisby S; Baadsgaard O; Byrialsen K; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jun; 48(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 14531867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro toxicity testing of implantation materials used in medicine: Effects on cell morphology, cell proliferation and DNA synthesis.
    Cervinka M; Půza V
    Toxicol In Vitro; 1990; 4(4-5):711-6. PubMed ID: 20702263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests.
    Sjögren G; Sletten G; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 10946345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immunostimulatory capacity of dental casting alloys on endotoxin responsiveness.
    Rachmawati D; von Blomberg BME; Kleverlaan CJ; Scheper RJ; van Hoogstraten IMW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):677-684. PubMed ID: 27881328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective versus routine patch metal allergy testing to select bar material for the Nuss procedure in 932 patients over 10years.
    Obermeyer RJ; Gaffar S; Kelly RE; Kuhn MA; Frantz FW; McGuire MM; Paulson JF; Kelly CS
    J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Feb; 53(2):260-264. PubMed ID: 29223667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cytotoxicity of alloying elements and experimental titanium alloys by WST-1 and agar overlay tests.
    Song YH; Kim MK; Park EJ; Song HJ; Anusavice KJ; Park YJ
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):977-83. PubMed ID: 24946979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of biocompatibility of experimental titanium alloys for dental restorations.
    Wang RR; Li Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 9791800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of elemental ions released from different prosthodontic materials.
    Elshahawy WM; Watanabe I; Kramer P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1551-5. PubMed ID: 19682734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials.
    Schildhauer TA; Robie B; Muhr G; Köller M
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Jul; 20(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 16891939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity of copper-based dental alloys in cell culture.
    Bumgardner JD; Lucas LC; Tilden AB
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Oct; 23(10):1103-14. PubMed ID: 2808459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.