These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20694138)

  • 1. Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: a comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina.
    Chang MW; Ayeni C; Breuer S; Torbett BE
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11955. PubMed ID: 20694138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.
    Ding B; Wang J; Li N; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 23259763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Hierarchical Virtual Screening To Combat Drug Resistance of the HIV-1 Protease.
    Li N; Ainsworth RI; Ding B; Hou T; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1400-12. PubMed ID: 25993532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
    Islam MA; Pillay TS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking.
    Morris GM; Huey R; Olson AJ
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; Chapter 8():Unit 8.14. PubMed ID: 19085980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing binding of small molecules. II. Evaluating the potency of small molecules to combat resistance based on docking structures.
    Ding B; Li N; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23570305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of HIV wild-type and mutant structures via in silico docking against diverse ligand libraries.
    Chang MW; Lindstrom W; Olson AJ; Belew RK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1258-62. PubMed ID: 17447753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
    Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multipose binding in molecular docking.
    Atkovska K; Samsonov SA; Paszkowski-Rogacz M; Pisabarro MT
    Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Feb; 15(2):2622-45. PubMed ID: 24534807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.
    Deng N; Forli S; He P; Perryman A; Wickstrom L; Vijayan RS; Tiefenbrunn T; Stout D; Gallicchio E; Olson AJ; Levy RM
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 25189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
    Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advances in automated docking applied to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease.
    Miller MD; Sheridan RP; Kearsley SK; Underwood DJ
    Methods Enzymol; 1994; 241():354-70. PubMed ID: 7854188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
    Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4.
    Morris GM; Goodsell DS; Huey R; Olson AJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1996 Aug; 10(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 8877701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields.
    Radestock S; Böhm M; Gohlke H
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.
    Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2017; 20(9):820-827. PubMed ID: 29165067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual drug screen schema based on multiview similarity integration and ranking aggregation.
    Kang H; Sheng Z; Zhu R; Huang Q; Liu Q; Cao Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22332590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.
    Trott O; Olson AJ
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 19499576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.