252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20694138)
1. Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: a comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina.
Chang MW; Ayeni C; Breuer S; Torbett BE
PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11955. PubMed ID: 20694138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.
Ding B; Wang J; Li N; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 23259763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Hierarchical Virtual Screening To Combat Drug Resistance of the HIV-1 Protease.
Li N; Ainsworth RI; Ding B; Hou T; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1400-12. PubMed ID: 25993532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
Islam MA; Pillay TS
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking.
Morris GM; Huey R; Olson AJ
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; Chapter 8():Unit 8.14. PubMed ID: 19085980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing binding of small molecules. II. Evaluating the potency of small molecules to combat resistance based on docking structures.
Ding B; Li N; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23570305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of HIV wild-type and mutant structures via in silico docking against diverse ligand libraries.
Chang MW; Lindstrom W; Olson AJ; Belew RK
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1258-62. PubMed ID: 17447753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
Li Q; Shah S
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multipose binding in molecular docking.
Atkovska K; Samsonov SA; Paszkowski-Rogacz M; Pisabarro MT
Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Feb; 15(2):2622-45. PubMed ID: 24534807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.
Deng N; Forli S; He P; Perryman A; Wickstrom L; Vijayan RS; Tiefenbrunn T; Stout D; Gallicchio E; Olson AJ; Levy RM
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 25189630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in automated docking applied to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease.
Miller MD; Sheridan RP; Kearsley SK; Underwood DJ
Methods Enzymol; 1994; 241():354-70. PubMed ID: 7854188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4.
Morris GM; Goodsell DS; Huey R; Olson AJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1996 Aug; 10(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 8877701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields.
Radestock S; Böhm M; Gohlke H
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.
Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2017; 20(9):820-827. PubMed ID: 29165067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual drug screen schema based on multiview similarity integration and ranking aggregation.
Kang H; Sheng Z; Zhu R; Huang Q; Liu Q; Cao Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22332590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.
Trott O; Olson AJ
J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 19499576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
