These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20694474)

  • 21. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sweep visual evoked potential grating acuity thresholds paradoxically improve in low-luminance conditions in children with cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV; Hou C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):3220-4. PubMed ID: 16799070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.
    Hamilton R; Bach M; Heinrich SP; Hoffmann MB; Odom JV; McCulloch DL; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 142(1):25-74. PubMed ID: 32488810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maturation of Binocular, Monocular Grating Acuity and of the Visual Interocular Difference in the First 2 Years of Life.
    Costa MF; de Cássia Rodrigues Matos França V; Barboni MTS; Ventura DF
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 May; 49(3):159-170. PubMed ID: 28844161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of acuities determined with the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP).
    Ridder WH; Tong A; Floresca T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 124(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22262233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sweep visual evoked potential testing as a predictor of recognition acuity in albinism.
    Bradfield YS; France TD; Verhoeve J; Gangnon RE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 125(5):628-33. PubMed ID: 17502501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual impairment in children with spastic cerebral palsy measured by psychophysical and electrophysiological grating acuity tests.
    Costa MF; Ventura DF
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2012; 15(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 23030659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring recovery of visual function in children with papilledema using sweep visual evoked potentials.
    Mezer E; Westall CA; Mirabella G; Wygnanski-Jaffe T; Yagev R; Buncic JR
    J AAPOS; 2016 Jun; 20(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 27164429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening and diagnosis of optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 by using sweep visual evoked potentials.
    Chang BC; Mirabella G; Yagev R; Banh M; Mezer E; Parkin PC; Westall CA; Buncic JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2895-902. PubMed ID: 17525226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of contrast polarity reversal on face detection: evidence of perceptual asymmetry from sweep VEP.
    Liu-Shuang J; Ales JM; Rossion B; Norcia AM
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():8-19. PubMed ID: 25595857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of chromatic and luminance detection contours using the sweep VEP.
    Kelly JP; Chang S
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(14):1887-905. PubMed ID: 10837833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.
    Costa TL; Hamer RD; Nagy BV; Barboni MT; Gualtieri M; Boggio PS; Ventura DF
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1213-23. PubMed ID: 25600818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Correlation between contrast vision and sweep visual evoked potential acuity].
    Peng SY; Chen JM; Liu DM; Zhou S; Wang M; Xia WT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 31(1):20-2, 27. PubMed ID: 26058128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.
    Dotto PF; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Rocha DM; Salomão SR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 28560498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial vision deficits in infants and children with Down syndrome.
    John FM; Bromham NR; Woodhouse JM; Candy TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 May; 45(5):1566-72. PubMed ID: 15111616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity using the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Chen SA; Wu LZ; Wu DZ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Sep; 75(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 2276315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Wang Y; Han C; Du C; Yan W; Zhang S; Liang R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 139(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 31214918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.