159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20694910)
1. The recipe for overreaching regulation.
Schwab A
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):55-6. PubMed ID: 20694910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reversing "research exceptionalism".
Hansson SO
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):66-7. PubMed ID: 20694917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the case for the regulation of research.
Wilkinson T
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 20694915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Not all human subjects research is exceptional.
Moffatt B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):62-3. PubMed ID: 20694914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Responses to open peer commentaries on "research exceptionalism".
Hunter D; Wilson J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20694896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. To expedite or not to expedite ...that is the question.
Wicher CC; Michalek AM
J Cancer Educ; 2008; 23(3):140-1. PubMed ID: 18709583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Closing loopholes in the federal research regulations: some practical problems.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 19061095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The basics of human subjects protection.
Yoder LH
Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. One size does not fit all: the ethical imperative to limit the concept of research exceptionalism.
McCullough M
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):60-1. PubMed ID: 20694913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Not all research is equal: taking social science research into account.
Rasmussen LM
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):17-8. PubMed ID: 19061100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research exceptionalism.
Wilson J; Hunter D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):45-54. PubMed ID: 20694909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to commentators on "Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research".
Shamoo AE; Schwartz J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):W1. PubMed ID: 19061093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are human research subjects safe enough?
Thompson RE
Physician Exec; 2003; 29(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 14650072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight.
Schluger NW
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 19061098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reform of Clinical Research Regulations, Finally.
Emanuel EJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(24):2296-9. PubMed ID: 26536071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research firm changes subject notification procedure after complaint by potential subject.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Nov; 17(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 12708413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
