These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2069548)

  • 1. The recognition and prevalence of Bacteroides nodosus serotype M in Australia and New Zealand.
    Chetwin DH; Whitehead LC; Thorley SE
    Aust Vet J; 1991 Apr; 68(4):154-5. PubMed ID: 2069548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of Bacteroides nodosus by agglutination tests.
    Claxton PD; Ribeiro LA; Egerton JR
    Aust Vet J; 1983 Nov; 60(11):331-4. PubMed ID: 6667210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serotypic and biochemical characterization of Bacteroides nodosus isolates from Oregon.
    Schmitz JA; Gradin JL
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Oct; 44(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 7448630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serogrouping of Bacteroides nodosus isolates from 62 sources in the United States.
    Gradin JL; Sonn AE; Petrovska L
    Am J Vet Res; 1993 Jul; 54(7):1069-73. PubMed ID: 8368601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serogroups of Bacteroides nodosus isolated from ovine footrot in Britain.
    Hindmarsh F; Fraser J
    Vet Rec; 1985 Feb; 116(7):187-8. PubMed ID: 3992861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serological classification and virulence determination of Dichelobacter nodosus isolated from Alberta and British Columbia sheep.
    Olson ME; Gard MS; Gradin J; Morck DW
    Can J Vet Res; 1998 Jan; 62(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9442937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-protective immunity and the serological classification system for Bacteroides nodosus.
    Stewart DJ; Vaughan JA; Elleman TC; Hoyne PA; Burns KJ; Dufty JH
    Aust Vet J; 1991 Feb; 68(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 2025201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolation and characterisation of Bacteroides nodosus from foot lesions of cattle in Western Australia.
    Richards RB; Depiazzi LJ; Edwards JR; Wilkinson FC
    Aust Vet J; 1980 Nov; 56(11):517-21. PubMed ID: 7247884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface and somatic antigens of Fusiformis nodosus.
    Egerton JR
    J Comp Pathol; 1973 Jan; 83(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 4731308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of a multivalent Bacteroides nodosus vaccine against foot rot in sheep in Britain.
    Hindmarsh F; Fraser J; Scott K
    Vet Rec; 1989 Aug; 125(6):128-30. PubMed ID: 2773254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and grouping of Dichelobacter nodosus, using PCR and sequence analysis.
    John GH; Smith R; Abraham KJ; Ellis RP
    Mol Cell Probes; 1999 Feb; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 10024434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Update on ovine footrot in New Zealand: isolation, identification, and characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus strains [corrected].
    Cagatay IT; Hickford JG
    Vet Microbiol; 2005 Dec; 111(3-4):171-80. PubMed ID: 16280202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observations on the indirect transmission of virulent ovine footrot in sheep yards and its spread in sheep on unimproved pasture.
    Whittington RJ
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Apr; 72(4):132-4. PubMed ID: 7646377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between strains of Bacteroides nodosus in their effects on the severity of foot-rot, bodyweight and wool growth in Merino sheep.
    Stewart DJ; Clark BL; Jarrett RG
    Aust Vet J; 1984 Nov; 61(11):348-52. PubMed ID: 6529394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electron microscope study of Bacteroides nodusus: ultrastructure of organisms from primary isolates and different colony types.
    Short JA; Thorley CM; Walker PD
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1976 Jun; 40(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 945799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immunisation of cattle against interdigital dermatitis (foot-rot) with an autogenous Bacteroides nodosus vaccine.
    Clark BL; Stewart DJ; Emery DL; Dufty JH; Jarrett RG
    Aust Vet J; 1986 Feb; 63(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 3964147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The laboratory culture of Dichelobacter nodosus in a footrot eradication program.
    Pitman DR; Palmer MA; Depiazzi LJ
    Aust Vet J; 1994 Apr; 71(4):109-12. PubMed ID: 8048905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative test for Bacteroides nodosus pilus protein by an agglutination-absorption test.
    Every D
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1983 Oct; 55(2):305-13. PubMed ID: 6140254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence that Bacteroides nodosus belongs in subgroup gamma of the class Proteobacteria, not in the genus Bacteroides: partial sequence analysis of a B. nodosus 16S rRNA gene.
    La Fontaine S; Rood JI
    Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1990 Apr; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 2223609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severity and persistence of footrot in Merino sheep experimentally infected with a protease thermostable strain of Dichelobacter nodosus at five sites.
    Depiazzi LJ; Roberts WD; Hawkins CD; Palmer MA; Pitman DR; Mcquade NC; Jelinek PD; Devereaux DJ; Rippon RJ
    Aust Vet J; 1998 Jan; 76(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9578765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.