108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20696508)
1. Anatomical plate configuration affects mechanical performance in distal humerus fractures.
Penzkofer R; Hungerer S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Augat P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Dec; 25(10):972-8. PubMed ID: 20696508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical properties of orthogonal plate configuration versus parallel plate configuration using the same locking plate system for intra-articular distal humeral fractures under radial or ulnar column axial load.
Kudo T; Hara A; Iwase H; Ichihara S; Nagao M; Maruyama Y; Kaneko K
Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2071-2076. PubMed ID: 27578052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation technique for internal fixation of three-part proximal humerus fractures in a novel cadaveric model.
Brianza S; Plecko M; Gueorguiev B; Windolf M; Schwieger K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):886-92. PubMed ID: 20655635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of conventional versus locking plates in intraarticular calcaneus fractures: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Stoffel K; Booth G; Rohrl SM; Kuster M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 17007974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerus fractures].
Atalar AC; Demirhan M; Salduz A; Kiliçoğlu O; Seyahi A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2009; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 19293612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.
Seide K; Triebe J; Faschingbauer M; Schulz AP; Püschel K; Mehrtens G; Jürgens Ch
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17134800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra-articular distal humeral fractures in adults.
Henley MB
Orthop Clin North Am; 1987 Jan; 18(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 3796956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures.
Patel R; Neu CP; Curtiss S; Fyhrie DP; Yoo B
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 May; 25(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 21464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures.
Arnander MW; Reeves A; MacLeod IA; Pinto TM; Khaleel A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 18448987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Treatment of severely comminuted fractures of humeral intercondylar through approach of osteotomy olecranon with double-plate internal fixation].
Yang Y; Huang PQ; Fang JW
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 May; 22(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 19522383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus.
Schemitsch EH; Tencer AF; Henley MB
J Orthop Trauma; 1994 Dec; 8(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 7869160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biomechanical analysis of stability of internal fixator for proximal humeral fractures].
Zhu N; Chen Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1459-62. PubMed ID: 21261094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
