BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20696685)

  • 1. Which staging system to use for gynaecological cancers: a survey with recommendations for practice in the UK.
    McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Ganesan R; Kehoe S; Nordin A
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):768-70. PubMed ID: 20696685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TNM classification of gynaecological malignant tumours, eighth edition: changes between the seventh and eighth editions.
    Tokunaga H; Shimada M; Ishikawa M; Yaegashi N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):311-320. PubMed ID: 30668753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part I].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Sep; 76(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22026069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part II].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Oct; 76(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22132636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
    Kato T; Hasumi K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Apr; 25(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 9571979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staging for vaginal cancer.
    Rajaram S; Maheshwari A; Srivastava A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 25847318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues and inconsistencies in the revised gynecologic staging systems.
    Cole L; Stoler MH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 23062423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does debulking of enlarged positive lymph nodes improve survival in different gynaecological cancers?
    Somashekhar SP
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):870-83. PubMed ID: 26043964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a revision needed of the current FIGO staging system?
    Menczer J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1159-1161. PubMed ID: 28718876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten problematical issues identified by pathology review for multidisciplinary gynaecological oncology meetings.
    McCluggage WG
    J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 22011450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of Controversies and Unresolved Issues in the 2014 FIGO Staging System for Endometrial Cancer: Survey Results From Members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and International Gynecologic Cancer Society.
    Kayraklioglu N; Katsakhyan L; Cohen PA; Singh N; Rabban JT; Matias-Guiu X
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2024 May; 43(3):242-252. PubMed ID: 37668357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) proposals for changes of the current FIGO staging system.
    Petru E; Lück HJ; Stuart G; Gaffney D; Millan D; Vergote I;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Apr; 143(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 19195765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
    Tse KY; Ngan HY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
    Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National guidance on gynaecological cancer management: an audit of gynaecological cancer services and management in the South East of England.
    Shaw M; Wolfe C; Raju KS; Papadopoulos A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):246-50. PubMed ID: 12807233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Revised FIGO staging systems for gynecologic malignancies--2009 update].
    Zalewski K; Doniec J; Baranowski W; Bidziński M
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):778-82. PubMed ID: 21117307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
    Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which staging system to use for gynecological cancers: recommendations for practice in the United Kingdom.
    McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Ganesan R; Kehoe S; Nordin A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Nov; 20(8):1301-2. PubMed ID: 21051966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What's new in TNM?
    Hermanek P
    Pathol Res Pract; 1994 Jan; 190(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 8065994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.