These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20696685)

  • 21. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus.
    Lambregts DMJ; Bogveradze N; Blomqvist LK; Fokas E; Garcia-Aguilar J; Glimelius B; Gollub MJ; Konishi T; Marijnen CAM; Nagtegaal ID; Nilsson PJ; Perez RO; Snaebjornsson P; Taylor SA; Tolan DJM; Valentini V; West NP; Wolthuis A; Lahaye MJ; Maas M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 35254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Colorectal cancer staging using TNM 7: is it time to use this new staging system?
    Doyle VJ; Bateman AC
    J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 22228905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Standards, Options and Recommendations 2000: non metastatic endometrial cancer].
    Brémond A; Bataillard A; Thomas L; Achard JL; Fervers B; Fondrinier E; Lansac J; Bailly C; Hoffstetter S; d'Anjou J; Descamps P; Farsi F; Jean-Paul G; Laffargue F; Rodier JF; Vincent P; Pigneux J;
    Bull Cancer; 2002; 89(7-8):697-706. PubMed ID: 12206983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of frozen sections in gynaecological oncology: survey of practice in the United Kingdom.
    Ganesan R; Brown LJ; Kehoe S; McCluggage WG; El-Bahrawy MA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Feb; 166(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23199810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. L1CAM in early-stage type I endometrial cancer: results of a large multicenter evaluation.
    Zeimet AG; Reimer D; Huszar M; Winterhoff B; Puistola U; Azim SA; Müller-Holzner E; Ben-Arie A; van Kempen LC; Petru E; Jahn S; Geels YP; Massuger LF; Amant F; Polterauer S; Lappi-Blanco E; Bulten J; Meuter A; Tanouye S; Oppelt P; Stroh-Weigert M; Reinthaller A; Mariani A; Hackl W; Netzer M; Schirmer U; Vergote I; Altevogt P; Marth C; Fogel M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1142-50. PubMed ID: 23781004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
    Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The evaluation how FIGO stage in cervical cancer depends on frequency of gynaecological control].
    Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D; Emerich J; Milczek T
    Ginekol Pol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):823-8. PubMed ID: 12619315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Restaging in gynaecological cancers.
    Ayhan A; Celik H; Coskun F; Baykal C; Salman MC; Aksan G
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15754995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient initiated follow up after gynaecological malignancy: National survey of current UK practice.
    Coleman L; Newton C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():193-197. PubMed ID: 32240892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sentinel lymph node sampling in gynaecological cancers: techniques and clinical applications.
    El-Ghobashy AE; Saidi SA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):675-85. PubMed ID: 18980825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
    Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
    Pecorelli S; Benedet JL; Creasman WT; Shepherd JH
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jun; 65(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 10428343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
    Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The applicability of the proposed IASLC staging revisions to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with comparison to the current UICC 6th TNM Edition.
    Ignatius Ou SH; Zell JA
    J Thorac Oncol; 2009 Mar; 4(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 19156001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.
    Beddy P; O'Neill AC; Yamamoto AK; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):241-54. PubMed ID: 22236905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
    Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Update on the Role of MRI in Treatment Stratification of Patients with Cervical Cancer.
    Shakur A; Lee JYJ; Freeman S
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 37894476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging: too much, too soon?
    McCluggage WG; Bosse T; Gilks CB; Howitt BE; McAlpine JN; Nucci MR; Rabban JT; Singh N; Talia KL; Parra-Herran C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37935523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. History of the FIGO cancer staging system.
    Odicino F; Pecorelli S; Zigliani L; Creasman WT
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 May; 101(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18199437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.