These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20697250)

  • 1. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
    Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local audit of surgical pathology. 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital.
    Ramsay AD; Gallagher PJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 May; 16(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 1599026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in surgical pathology--personal and peer assessment.
    Murthy MS; Derman H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Mar; 75(3 Suppl):462-6. PubMed ID: 7468536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for pathology peer review.
    Morton D; Sellers RS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty JF; Irizarry A; McKay JS; Odin M; Teranishi M
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Dec; 38(7):1118-27. PubMed ID: 20924082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary case review methods and anatomic pathology culture.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):829-31. PubMed ID: 20472838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. An information system approach.
    Cowan DF
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Feb; 114(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 2302029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing and Customizing Laboratory Information Systems to Improve/Enhance Pathologist Workflow.
    Hartman DJ
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Jun; 8(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 26065788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance measures for critical diagnoses in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 137(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 22338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Core components of a comprehensive quality assurance program in anatomic pathology.
    Nakhleh RE
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2009 Nov; 16(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19851132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An implementation plan for autopsy quality control and quality assurance.
    Young NA; Naryshkin S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 May; 117(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 8489345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
    Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality in surgical pathology communication and reporting.
    Nakhleh RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1394-7. PubMed ID: 22032564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.