These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20697289)

  • 1. Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.
    Beskow LM; Friedman JY; Hardy NC; Lin L; Weinfurt KP
    Genet Med; 2010 Sep; 12(9):567-72. PubMed ID: 20697289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants?
    Beskow LM; Hammack-Aviran CM; Brelsford KM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32414333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.
    Singh S; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 34210291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.
    Beskow LM; Dean E
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(6):1440-51. PubMed ID: 18559560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning-based donor permission extraction from informed consent documents.
    Zhang M; Sankaranarayanapillai M; Du J; Xiang Y; Manion FJ; Harris MR; Stansbury C; Pham HA; Tao C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 24(Suppl 3):477. PubMed ID: 38102593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form.
    Sedig LK; De Loney EH; Bailey SB; Spector-Bagdady K; Ghita B; Krienke LK; Hutchinson R
    Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jul; 44(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 35802790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
    Beskow LM; Friedman JY; Hardy NC; Lin L; Weinfurt KP
    PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13302. PubMed ID: 20949049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consensus on Language for Advance Informed Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia Clinical Trials Using a Delphi Process.
    Corneli A; Calvert SB; Powers JH; Swezey T; Collyar D; Perry B; Farley JJ; Santiago J; Donnelly HK; De Anda C; Blanchard K; Fowler VG; Holland TL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205435. PubMed ID: 32442291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent for research and authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: an integrated approach.
    Shalowitz D; Wendler D
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 May; 144(9):685-8. PubMed ID: 16670138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank.
    Heeney C; Kerr SM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 29282045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.
    Garrett SB; Murphy M; Wiley J; Dohan D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):326-334. PubMed ID: 29037106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.
    Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.
    Verástegui EL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 7():E13. PubMed ID: 17166274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.
    Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
    Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative thematic analysis of consent forms used in cancer genome sequencing.
    Allen C; Foulkes WD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2011 Jul; 12():14. PubMed ID: 21771309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?
    Serepkaite J; Valuckiene Z; Gefenas E
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Dec; 20(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 24136750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.
    Peppercorn J; Campbell E; Isakoff S; Horick NK; Rabin J; Quain K; Sequist LV; Bardia A; Collyar D; Hlubocky F; Mathews D
    Oncologist; 2020 Jan; 25(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 31492767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.