BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20697312)

  • 1. The evolution of mandibular distraction: device selection.
    Davidson EH; Brown D; Shetye PR; Greig AVH; Grayson BH; Warren SM; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):2061-2070. PubMed ID: 20697312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Documentation of the incidents associated with mandibular distraction: introduction of a new stratification system.
    Shetye PR; Warren SM; Brown D; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Feb; 123(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 19182623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discussion. The evolution of mandibular distraction: device selection.
    Fearon JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):2071-2073. PubMed ID: 21124146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular deformities: single-vector distraction techniques for a multivector problem.
    Singh DJ; Glick PH; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1468-72. PubMed ID: 19816280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis with a semiburied device.
    Padwa BL; Kearns GJ; Todd R; Troulis M; Mulliken JB; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10065640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: a report of 8 cases.
    Rubio-Bueno P; Padrón A; Villa E; Díaz-González FJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 58(6):593-9; discussion 600-1. PubMed ID: 10847278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neonatal mandibular distraction in a patient with Treacher Collins syndrome.
    Brevi BC; Leporati M; Sesenna E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):e44-8. PubMed ID: 25569412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new way to anchor the external device in mandibular distraction: three case reports with a Pierre Robin sequence.
    Fariña R; Castellón L; Nagelash E; Valladares S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 40(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 21330107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible: device development and clinical application.
    McCarthy JG; Williams JK; Grayson BH; Crombie JS
    J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Jul; 9(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 9780926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidents of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Hemifacial Microsomia.
    Wang X; Feng S; Tang X; Shi L; Yin L; Liu W; Yin H; Yang Y; Zhang Z
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Oct; 142(4):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 30020235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a semiburied, fixed-trajectory, curvilinear, distraction device in an animal model.
    Seldin EB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 57(12):1442-6; discussion 1447-8. PubMed ID: 10596666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal craniofacial distraction with biodegradable devices: early stabilization and protected bone regeneration.
    Cohen SR; Holmes RE; Amis P; Fichtner H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jul; 11(4):354-66. PubMed ID: 11314384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
    Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bone distraction using an external fixator: a new mandibular lengthening technic. A preliminary study apropos of 2 cases of children with mandibular hypoplasia].
    Kollar EM; Diner PA; Vazquez MP; Accart G; Pirollo M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1994; 95(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 7855539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with a small semiburied device in neonates: report of 2 cases.
    Brevi B; Laganà F; Piazza F; Sesenna E
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Feb; 85(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 16579198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Guerrero CA; Bell WH; Contasti GI; Rodríguez AM
    Semin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10371938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction.
    Vendittelli BL; Dec W; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Oct; 122(4):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 18827649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a new semiburied curvilinear distraction device in dogs.
    Niu XG; Han XX
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 17646039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
    Sant'Anna EF; Lau GW; Marquezan M; de Souza Araújo MT; Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):566-77. PubMed ID: 25919102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.