BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20697463)

  • 1. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
    Harris ST; Zeng X
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course.
    Stein PS; Challman SD; Brueckner JK
    J Nurs Educ; 2006 Nov; 45(11):469-73. PubMed ID: 17120866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures.
    Stoddard HA; Piquette CA
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 20881700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
    Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
    Porter AG; Tousman S
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audience response techniques for 21st century radiology education.
    Richardson ML
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):834-41. PubMed ID: 24833568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spiral curriculum: implications for online learning.
    Masters K; Gibbs T
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Dec; 7():52. PubMed ID: 18154654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Student perceptions of gamified audience response system interactions in large group lectures and via lecture capture technology.
    Pettit RK; McCoy L; Kinney M; Schwartz FN
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 May; 15():92. PubMed ID: 25997953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive pedagogical tools could be helpful for medical education continuity during COVID-19 outbreak.
    Grzych G; Schraen-Maschke S
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2020 Aug; 78(4):446-448. PubMed ID: 32627731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blended learning in basic medical laboratory courses improves medical students' abilities in self-learning, understanding, and problem solving.
    Chen J; Zhou J; Wang Y; Qi G; Xia C; Mo G; Zhang Z
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Mar; 44(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 31821032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term retention of knowledge after a distance course in medical informatics at Charles University Prague.
    Naidr JP; Adla T; Janda A; Feberová J; Kasal P; Hladíková M
    Teach Learn Med; 2004; 16(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 15388381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
    Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
    Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
    J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The educational value of an audience response system use in an Iraqi medical school.
    Tuma F; Majeed H; Blebea J; Nassar A; Durchholz WC; Schofield S
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Apr; 22(1):319. PubMed ID: 35473705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
    Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students' experiences and attitudes.
    Gormley GJ; Collins K; Boohan M; Bickle IC; Stevenson M
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e6-12. PubMed ID: 19253150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students.
    Attardi SM; Barbeau ML; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Nov; 11(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 29493909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using audience response technology in hospital education programs.
    McRae ME; Elgie-Watson J
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2010 Jul; 41(7):323-8. PubMed ID: 20411876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.