BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698044)

  • 1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Herbella FA; Patti MG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 16(30):3811-5. PubMed ID: 20698044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
    Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies.
    Ben-David K; Sarosi GA; Cendan JC; Howard D; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 21792712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Dantoc M; Cox MR; Eslick GD
    Arch Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(8):768-76. PubMed ID: 22911078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical review of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Sudarshan M; Ferri L
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Aug; 22(4):310-8. PubMed ID: 22874679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques after 15 years of experience.
    Zhang J; Wang R; Liu S; Luketich JD; Chen S; Chen H; Schuchert MJ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Sep; 16(9):1768-74. PubMed ID: 22777054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the selection between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy].
    Tan L; Tang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):971-974. PubMed ID: 27680061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Dong X; Cong B; Peng C; Sun Q; Hao Y; Zhao X
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 64(7):606-610. PubMed ID: 26765245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer.
    Santillan AA; Farma JM; Meredith KL; Shah NR; Kelley ST
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2008 Oct; 6(9):879-84. PubMed ID: 18926097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview.
    Smithers BM
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 4(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 20136592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer.
    Decker G; Coosemans W; De Leyn P; Decaluwé H; Nafteux P; Van Raemdonck D; Lerut T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):13-20; discussion 20-1. PubMed ID: 18952454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.