133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698108)
21. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cytological classification of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
Agamova KA; Nikitina NI; Gosh TE; Tikhomirova EE; Gladunova ZD
Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 3590668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Papillomavirus infection of the cervix. II. Relationship to intraepithelial neoplasia based on the presence of specific viral structural proteins.
Kurman RJ; Jenson AB; Lancaster WD
Am J Surg Pathol; 1983 Jan; 7(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 6299124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Detection of various papilloma virus types in cytologic smears of precancerous conditions and cancers of the uterine cervix].
Wagner D; de Villiers EM; Gissmann L
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 45(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 2989076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation discrepancies between high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cytological/histological correlation study from a single-institution experience.
Zhang M; Carrozza M; Huang Y
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24335093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Accuracy of liquid-based cytology in diagnosis of high-grade squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Li M; Mei P; Luo DL; Wang XB; Liu YH
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 41(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 22800524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Positive Predictive Value of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion on Cytology for the Histological Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Higher: A Systematic Review.
Karia N; Van Loon A; Simoens C; Benoy I; Bogers J
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 30947186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The Bethesda system--an improvement in classification of cervix cytology?].
Kainz C; Tempfer C; Bancher D; Sliutz G; Breitenecker G; Reinthaller A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 55(8):435-40. PubMed ID: 7557218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is there any clinical advantage in separating CIN 2 from CIN 3 in the current two-tiered cytological classification?
Boonlikit S; Srisantiroj N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19469637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of genomic amplification of the human telomerase gene (TERC) in cytologic specimens as a genetic test for the diagnosis of cervical dysplasia.
Heselmeyer-Haddad K; Janz V; Castle PE; Chaudhri N; White N; Wilber K; Morrison LE; Auer G; Burroughs FH; Sherman ME; Ried T
Am J Pathol; 2003 Oct; 163(4):1405-16. PubMed ID: 14507648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy of oral cancer cytology in a pilot study.
Sekine J; Nakatani E; Hideshima K; Iwahashi T; Sasaki H
Diagn Pathol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):27. PubMed ID: 28298213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is severe dysplasia the same lesion as carcinoma in situ? 10-Year follow-up of laryngeal precancerous lesions.
Zhang HK; Liu HG
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 132(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 22229875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. HLA class II DRB1*1302 allele protects against progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Matsumoto K; Maeda H; Oki A; Takatsuka N; Yasugi T; Furuta R; Hirata R; Mitsuhashi A; Fujii T; Hirai Y; Iwasaka T; Yaegashi N; Watanabe Y; Nagai Y; Kitagawa T; Yoshikawa H;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 22391763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Progression of cervical lesions in HIV-seropositive women: a cytological study.
Calore EE; Pereira SM; Cavaliere MJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 11169890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliability of histopathologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bellina JH; Dunlap WP; Riopelle MA
South Med J; 1982 Jan; 75(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 7054882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Establishing guidlines for dealing with mild dysplasia through cytology and colposcopy (follow up study)].
Tanaka H; Kimura E; Onda T; Ishida N; Tenjin Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 37(12):2681-90. PubMed ID: 4086900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical studies on intravaginal administration of CDDP for dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Nakayama K; Sano Y; Endo Y; Sato H; Ohyama T; Yamaguchi M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 44(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 1545173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Histological 'progression' from low (LSIL) to high (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesion is an uncommon event and an indication for quality assurance review.
Chen EY; Tran A; Raho CJ; Birch CM; Crum CP; Hirsch MS
Mod Pathol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 20473279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Some opinions for intraepithelial neoplasia in female genital duct].
Zhou XR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 46(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21429427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
