These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698266)

  • 1. [Comparison of the effect of solution environment on humic acid removal behavior with charged and traditional neutral ultrafiltration membranes].
    Hou J; Shao JH; He YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1518-24. PubMed ID: 20698266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of charged ultrafiltration membrane on natural organic matter removal and membrane fouling].
    Hou J; Shao JH; He YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1525-31. PubMed ID: 20698267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study on the efficiency of ultrafiltration technology in dealing with sudden cadmium pollution in surface water and ultrafiltration membrane fouling.
    Meng Q; Nan J; Wang Z; Ji X; Wu F; Liu B; Xiao Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(16):16641-16651. PubMed ID: 30989604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of humic acid foulant from ultrafiltration membrane surface using photocatalytic oxidation process.
    Fang H; Sun DD; Wu M; Phay W; Tay JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):373-80. PubMed ID: 16003999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of biochar-ultrafiltration membrane processes for humic acid removal under various hydrodynamic, pH, ionic strength, and pressure conditions.
    Shankar V; Heo J; Al-Hamadani YAJ; Park CM; Chu KH; Yoon Y
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():610-618. PubMed ID: 28432886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by complexation-ultrafiltration with chitosan].
    Xie ZW; Shao JH; He YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1532-6. PubMed ID: 20698268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Removal of EDCs(BPA) by ultrafiltration and impact factors].
    Wang L; Dong BZ; Gao NY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Feb; 28(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 17489192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of composite flocculants made of polyaluminium chloride and polydimethyldiallyammonium chloride on ultra-filtration membrane characteristics].
    Chu YB; Zhou XZ; Wang Y; Wang Q
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 May; 31(5):1206-10. PubMed ID: 20623852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of floc dynamic protection layer on alleviating ultrafiltration membrane fouling induced by humic substances.
    Ma B; Wu S; Wang B; Qi Z; Bai Y; Liu H; Qu J; Wu R
    J Environ Sci (China); 2020 Apr; 90():10-19. PubMed ID: 32081307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane.
    Chang H; Liu B; Liang H; Yu H; Shao S; Li G
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():254-264. PubMed ID: 28371709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.
    Yu W; Liu T; Crawshaw J; Liu T; Graham N
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():353-362. PubMed ID: 29665507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism.
    Wang J; Wang XC
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(5):880-4. PubMed ID: 17278741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a better hydraulic cleaning strategy for ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: Effect of backwash water composition.
    Chang H; Liang H; Qu F; Ma J; Ren N; Li G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():177-186. PubMed ID: 27155423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The removal of typical pollutants in secondary effluent by the combined process of powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration.
    Sun L; He N; Yu T; Duan X; Feng C; Zhang Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 75(5-6):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 28333064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery of small dye molecules from aqueous solutions using charged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Chen X; Zhao Y; Moutinho J; Shao J; Zydney AL; He Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar; 284():58-64. PubMed ID: 25463218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified coagulation-ultrafiltration process for silver nanoparticles removal and membrane fouling mitigation: The role of laminarin.
    Zou Z; Gu Y; Yang W; Liu M; Han J; Zhao S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Mar; 172():241-249. PubMed ID: 33454322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanofiltration membrane fouling by oppositely charged macromolecules: investigation on flux behavior, foulant mass deposition, and solute rejection.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8941-7. PubMed ID: 21928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of ultrafiltration membrane with nanoscale zerovalent iron layers for humic acid fouling reduction.
    Ma B; Yu W; Jefferson WA; Liu H; Qu J
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():140-9. PubMed ID: 25613411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.