These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698421)

  • 1. Marginal behaviour of self-etch adhesive/composite and combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Kournetas N; Kakaboura A; Giftopoulos D; Chakmachi M; Rahiotis C; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Jun; 18(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 20698421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
    Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations using a resin liner on deproteinized substrate.
    Correr GM; Bruschi Alonso RC; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Coelho Sinhoreti MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 16040445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
    Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin.
    Montes MA; de Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Duarte RM; Sobrinho LC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 12877423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling.
    Kournetas N; Chakmakchi M; Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Sep; 8(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 15248053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.