These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698459)

  • 41. Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear.
    Haider H; Garvin K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Nov; 466(11):2677-85. PubMed ID: 18758877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Wear and toughness of crosslinked polyethylene for total knee replacements: a study using a simulator and small-punch testing.
    Akagi M; Asano T; Clarke IC; Niiyama N; Kyomoto M; Nakamura T; Hamanishi C
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Oct; 24(10):2021-7. PubMed ID: 16894591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Most E; Li G; Schule S; Sultan P; Park SE; Zayontz S; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):197-207. PubMed ID: 14646762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gait cycle finite element comparison of rotating-platform total knee designs.
    Otto JK; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):181-8. PubMed ID: 12771829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meniscal wear at a three-component total ankle prosthesis by a knee joint simulator.
    Affatato S; Leardini A; Leardini W; Giannini S; Viceconti M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1871-6. PubMed ID: 17014854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Kinematic analysis of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using a 6-DOF knee simulator.
    Hamai S; Miura H; Higaki H; Shimoto T; Nakanishi Y; Iwamoto Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2008 Nov; 13(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 19089542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative in vitro wear testing of PEEK and UHMWPE capped metacarpophalangeal prostheses.
    Joyce TJ; Rieker C; Unsworth A
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16410639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mobile-bearing knee systems: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear and design issues.
    Greenwald AS; Heim CS
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():195-205. PubMed ID: 15948447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [In vitro investigation of posterior cruciate ligament strain following total knee arthroplasty].
    Siebel T; Käfer W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16625446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A study on polyethylene stresses in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using explicit finite element analysis.
    Srinivas GR; Deb A; Kumar MN
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2013; 23(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 24579894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of tibial tray design on the wear of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Galvin A; Jennings LM; McEwen HM; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Nov; 222(8):1289-93. PubMed ID: 19143421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.
    Engh CA; Zimmerman RL; Hopper RH; Engh GA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 22879092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fluid composition impacts standardized testing protocols in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene knee wear testing.
    Schwenke T; Kaddick C; Schneider E; Wimmer MA;
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Nov; 219(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 16312105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Does increased tibial slope reduce the wear rate of unicompartmental knee prostheses? An in vitro investigation].
    Weber P; Schröder C; Utzschneider S; Schmidutz F; Jansson V; Müller PE
    Orthopade; 2012 Apr; 41(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 22476420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mobile or fixed unicompartmental knee prostheses? In-vitro wear assessments to solve this dilemma.
    Taddei P; Modena E; Grupp TM; Affatato S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1936-46. PubMed ID: 22098892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Posterior stability in fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a radiological comparison of two implants.
    Siebold R; Louisia S; Canty J; Bartlett RJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Feb; 127(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 17021758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints.
    Jennings LM; Bell CI; Ingham E; Komistek RD; Stone MH; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Apr; 221(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 17539585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Brockett CL; Jennings LM; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 May; 225(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 21755780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The influence of implant design and limb alignment on in vivo wear rates of fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knee implant retrievals.
    Dreyer MJ; Weisse B; Contreras Raggio JI; Zboray R; Taylor WR; Preiss S; Horn N
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Apr; 42(4):777-787. PubMed ID: 37975250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Wear and creep behavior of total knee implants undergoing wear testing.
    Teeter MG; Parikh A; Taylor M; Sprague J; Naudie DD
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 25175057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.