214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20698804)
1. Whole-body MRI with assessment of hepatic and extraabdominal enhancement after administration of gadoxetic acid for staging of rectal carcinoma.
Huppertz A; Franiel T; Wagner M; Püttcher O; Wagner J; Rief M; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Strassburg J
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):842-50. PubMed ID: 20698804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol.
Zizka J; Klzo L; Ferda J; Mrklovský M; Bukac J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17367974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.
Brismar TB; Dahlstrom N; Edsborg N; Persson A; Smedby O; Albiin N
Acta Radiol; 2009 Sep; 50(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 19701821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hepatocellular MR contrast agents: enhancement characteristics of liver parenchyma and portal vein after administration of gadoxetic acid in comparison to gadobenate dimeglumine.
Feuerlein S; Gupta RT; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2037-41. PubMed ID: 21719224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal dynamic MRI enhancement patterns of the upper abdominal organs: gadoxetic acid compared with gadobutrol.
Kühn JP; Hegenscheid K; Siegmund W; Froehlich CP; Hosten N; Puls R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1318-23. PubMed ID: 19843748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancement of liver parenchyma after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast media: a comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine.
Filippone A; Blakeborough A; Breuer J; Grazioli L; Gschwend S; Hammerstingl R; Heinz-Peer G; Kittner T; Laghi A; Leen E; Lencioni R; Lucidarme O; Remplik P; Robinson PJ; Ruehm SG; Schaefer F; Stoupis C; Tombach B; Valette PJ; Zech CJ; Huppertz A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 20099349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with hepatic and renal impairment.
Gschwend S; Ebert W; Schultze-Mosgau M; Breuer J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):556-66. PubMed ID: 21623212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body MR imaging versus sequential multimodal diagnostic algorithm for staging patients with rectal cancer: cost analysis.
Huppertz A; Schmidt M; Wagner M; Puettcher O; Asbach P; Strassburg J; Stöckmann F; Schöffski O; Maurer MH
Rofo; 2010 Sep; 182(9):793-802. PubMed ID: 20517819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging.
Sun HY; Lee JM; Shin CI; Lee DH; Moon SK; Kim KW; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20057319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement.
Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents.
Husarik DB; Gupta RT; Ringe KI; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1549-54. PubMed ID: 21958599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver].
Zhang HM; Ouyang H; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16750014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators.
Essig M; Tartaro A; Tartaglione T; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 16679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of brain metastases at 3.0 T using high-relaxivity contrast agents.
Huang B; Liang CH; Liu HJ; Wang GY; Zhang SX
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 19912078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Knopp MV; Giesel FL; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Radeleff J; Requardt M; Kirchin MA; Hentrich HR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jun; 17(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 12766899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preoperative staging of bladder carcinomas with Gd-DTPA-supported dynamic magnetic resonance tomography. Comparison with plain and Gd-DTPA-supported spin-echo sequences].
Venz S; Hosten N; Ilg J; Mäurer J; Podrabsky P; Fedel M; Ebert T; Nagel R
Rofo; 1996 Mar; 164(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 8672777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute reperfused myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison of ECIII-60 and Gd-DTPA in a swine model.
Jin J; Teng G; Feng Y; Wu Y; Jin Q; Wang Y; Wang Z; Lu Q; Jiang Y; Wang S; Chen F; Marchal G; Ni Y
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 17216375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
