BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2069936)

  • 1. [Impression technique with tubes].
    Brindis Rodríguez A; Rico Cárdenas R
    Rev ADM; 1991; 48(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 2069936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
    Cloyd S; Puri S
    Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique for improving the marginal fit of temporary acrylic resin crowns using injection of self-curing acrylic resin.
    Aviv I; Himmel R; Assif D
    Quintessence Int; 1986 May; 17(5):313-5. PubMed ID: 3523585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Full band impressions].
    Morel F; Gerlach A; Bois D
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 2218275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elastic impressions using custom acrylic trays.
    Tosti A
    Dent Dig; 1969 Mar; 75(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 4886025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporization utilizing the double bite impression tray, Part 1.
    Kwok LA
    Dent Assist; 1993; 62(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9790027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modified indirect working die technique for fabricating provisional restorations for multiple teeth.
    Antonelli JR; Gulker I
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):392-6. PubMed ID: 11203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cast impression coping technique.
    Vasilakis GJ; Vasilakis MD
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 15061334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impression materials and gingival retraction techniques for crowns and bridges.
    Purton DG
    N Z Dent J; 1988 Jul; 84(377):80-3. PubMed ID: 3067161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.