These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2069936)
41. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique. Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix. Sabbak SA J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures. Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Habib AN; Shehata MT Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Presenting a very accurate impression procedure and testing the accuracy of the impression obtained. Stern SS Dent Today; 2003 Apr; 22(4):72-7. PubMed ID: 12733406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression]. Biffar R; Bittner B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dimensional change of custom acrylic impression trays. Stackhouse JA J N J Dent Assoc; 1976; 47(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 801953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse. Pesun IJ; Swain VL J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impression making with gingival hyperplasia using the copper band technique. Small BW Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):334-7. PubMed ID: 22313816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one, all-plastic impression trays. Gottlieb M Dent Econ; 1996 Jan; 86(1):102-3. PubMed ID: 8612944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Mechanical retraction for elastic impression procedures. Carin A N Y J Dent; 1987 Dec-1988 Jan; 57(7):263-5. PubMed ID: 3323959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Temporaries: a preview of the permanent work using the new generation self-cure resin Snap and a vacuum mold matrix. Dwork H N Y J Dent; 1981 Sep; 51(8):234-6. PubMed ID: 7041018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Comparative analysis of 3D data visibility of the prepared tooth finishing line on a synthetic jaw model, captured by international scanners in a laboratory conditions]. Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(5):39-46. PubMed ID: 27876722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Evolution of technic of global impressions by tubes with impression material]. Martini L; Soumeire J Chir Dent Fr; 1977 Jan; 47(332):55-7. PubMed ID: 354899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Compound-copper band impressions: how and why. Kapin SH; Schoolnik PR Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1979 Dec; 10(12):23-30. PubMed ID: 399693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]