These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Attractor-map versus autoassociation based attractor dynamics in the hippocampal network. Colgin LL; Leutgeb S; Jezek K; Leutgeb JK; Moser EI; McNaughton BL; Moser MB J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 20445029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Crosstalk and transitions between multiple spatial maps in an attractor neural network model of the hippocampus: collective motion of the activity. Monasson R; Rosay S Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Mar; 89(3):032803. PubMed ID: 24730895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-organising continuous attractor networks with multiple activity packets, and the representation of space. Stringer SM; Rolls ET; Trappenberg TP Neural Netw; 2004 Jan; 17(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 14690703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crosstalk and transitions between multiple spatial maps in an attractor neural network model of the hippocampus: phase diagram. Monasson R; Rosay S Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jun; 87(6):062813. PubMed ID: 23848735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motor-maps, navigation and implicit space representation in the hippocampus. Kaske A; Winber G; Cöster J Biol Cybern; 2006 Jan; 94(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 16331489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Locus Coeruleus Phasic, But Not Tonic, Activation Initiates Global Remapping in a Familiar Environment. Grella SL; Neil JM; Edison HT; Strong VD; Odintsova IV; Walling SG; Martin GM; Marrone DF; Harley CW J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 30478033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple bumps can enhance robustness to noise in continuous attractor networks. Wang R; Kang L PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010547. PubMed ID: 36215305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Megamap: flexible representation of a large space embedded with nonspatial information by a hippocampal attractor network. Hedrick KR; Zhang K J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):868-91. PubMed ID: 27193320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning to represent continuous variables in heterogeneous neural networks. Darshan R; Rivkind A Cell Rep; 2022 Apr; 39(1):110612. PubMed ID: 35385721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-organizing continuous attractor networks and path integration: one-dimensional models of head direction cells. Stringer SM; Trappenberg TP; Rolls ET; de Araujo IE Network; 2002 May; 13(2):217-42. PubMed ID: 12061421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orientation tuning properties of simple cells in area V1 derived from an approximate analysis of nonlinear neural field models. Wennekers T Neural Comput; 2001 Aug; 13(8):1721-47. PubMed ID: 11506668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. Samsonovich A; McNaughton BL J Neurosci; 1997 Aug; 17(15):5900-20. PubMed ID: 9221787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From fixed points to chaos: three models of delayed discrimination. Barak O; Sussillo D; Romo R; Tsodyks M; Abbott LF Prog Neurobiol; 2013 Apr; 103():214-22. PubMed ID: 23438479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]