255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2070184)
41. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
Platin E
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
Hofmann T
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
Farman AG; Farman TT
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
Mairgünther RH
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Radiation exposure of the patient exemplified by lateral cranial image in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the film-screen system].
Seifert H; Kubale R; Blass G; Kunz G; Wagner P; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Oct; 48(10):298-303. PubMed ID: 7502166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Film-screen digital radiography.
Schwenker RP; Eger H
Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
