These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2070184)

  • 41. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
    Hofmann T
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
    Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
    Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality.
    Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Radiation exposure of the patient exemplified by lateral cranial image in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the film-screen system].
    Seifert H; Kubale R; Blass G; Kunz G; Wagner P; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Oct; 48(10):298-303. PubMed ID: 7502166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.