172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20702591)
1. Comparison of the toxicity of smoke from conventional and harm reduction cigarettes using human embryonic stem cells.
Lin S; Fonteno S; Weng JH; Talbot P
Toxicol Sci; 2010 Nov; 118(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 20702591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of toxicity of smoke from traditional and harm-reduction cigarettes using mouse embryonic stem cells as a novel model for preimplantation development.
Lin S; Tran V; Talbot P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Feb; 24(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 19043081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Video bioinformatics analysis of human embryonic stem cell colony growth.
Lin S; Fonteno S; Satish S; Bhanu B; Talbot P
J Vis Exp; 2010 May; (39):. PubMed ID: 20495527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smoke from traditional commercial, harm reduction and research brand cigarettes impairs oviductal functioning in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in vitro.
Riveles K; Tran V; Roza R; Kwan D; Talbot P
Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):346-55. PubMed ID: 17071822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Impedes Human Osteoblast Differentiation Independently of Nicotine.
Martinez IKC; Sparks NRL; Madrid JV; Talbot P; Zur Nieden NI
Nicotine Tob Res; 2022 Nov; 24(12):1921-1926. PubMed ID: 35778911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mainstream smoke and sidestream smoke affect the cardiac differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells discriminately.
Cheng W; Zhou R; Feng Y; Wang Y
Toxicology; 2016 May; 357-358():1-10. PubMed ID: 27237783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apoptotic effects of cigarette smoke extracts on mouse embryonic stem cells via oxidative stress.
Kim CW; Go RE; Hwang KA; Jeung EB; Choi SJ; Choi KC
Environ Toxicol; 2019 Jun; 34(6):689-698. PubMed ID: 30742351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study on the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke from low-tar cigarettes.
Chortyk OT; Chamberlain WJ
Arch Environ Health; 1990; 45(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 2400246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity according to brand differences in published toxicant emissions.
Laugesen M; Fowles J
N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1213):U1401. PubMed ID: 15843830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative carcinogenicity of cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke condensates on the mouse skin.
Mohtashamipur E; Mohtashamipur A; Germann PG; Ernst H; Norpoth K; Mohr U
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1990; 116(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 2254379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of in vivo DNA damage induced by very low doses of mainstream and sidestream smoke extracts using a novel assay.
Ganapathy V; Ramachandran I; Rubenstein DA; Queimado L
Am J Prev Med; 2015 Jan; 48(1 Suppl 1):S102-10. PubMed ID: 25528699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study by electron paramagnetic resonance of free radical species in the mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes with conventional acetate filters and 'bio-filters'.
Valavanidis A; Haralambous E
Redox Rep; 2001; 6(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 11523591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic toxicology studies comparing the activity of sidestream smoke from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco.
Doolittle DJ; Lee CK; Ivett JL; Mirsalis JC; Riccio E; Rudd CJ; Burger GT; Hayes AW
Mutat Res; 1990 Feb; 240(2):59-72. PubMed ID: 2300076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sidestream Smoke Extracts from Harm-Reduction and Conventional Camel Cigarettes Inhibit Osteogenic Differentiation via Oxidative Stress and Differential Activation of intrinsic Apoptotic Pathways.
Sparks NRL; Walker LM; Sera SR; Madrid JV; Hanna M; Dominguez EC; Zur Nieden NI
Antioxidants (Basel); 2022 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 36552682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harm Perceptions of Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarettes Differ by Brand, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender in US Adult Smokers: Results from PATH Wave 1.
Cohn AM; Rose SW; Ilakkuvan V; Gray T; Curry L; Villanti AC; Mays D; Lindblom E; Tercyak K; Debnam C; Mayo A; Perreras L
Nicotine Tob Res; 2019 Mar; 21(4):439-449. PubMed ID: 29385527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream smoke from U.S.-brand and non-U.S.-brand cigarettes from 14 countries.
Wu W; Zhang L; Jain RB; Ashley DL; Watson CH
Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Jun; 7(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 16085512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cigarette circumference on smoke chemistry, biological activity, and smoking behaviour.
McAdam K; Eldridge A; Fearon IM; Liu C; Manson A; Murphy J; Porter A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():111-126. PubMed ID: 27634061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity: the case for including charcoal filters.
Laugesen M; Fowles J
N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1213):U1402. PubMed ID: 15843831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from U.S. brand and non-U.S. brand cigarettes.
Ding YS; Yan XJ; Jain RB; Lopp E; Tavakoli A; Polzin GM; Stanfill SB; Ashley DL; Watson CH
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Feb; 40(4):1133-8. PubMed ID: 16572766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of mainstream whole smoke and smoke condensate from a cigarette containing a novel carbon filter.
Bombick DW; Bombick BR; Ayres PH; Putnam K; Avalos J; Borgerding MF; Doolittle DJ
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Sep; 39(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9325023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
