BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20702866)

  • 1. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.
    Duran ND; Dale R; McNamara DS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 20702866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's knowledge of deceptive gaze cues and its relation to their actual lying behavior.
    McCarthy A; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jun; 103(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 18678376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
    Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control.
    Nuñez JM; Casey BJ; Egner T; Hare T; Hirsch J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 15734361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics.
    Farrow TF; Hopwood MC; Parks RW; Hunter MD; Spence SA
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 21291161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.
    Farrow TF; Reilly R; Rahman TA; Herford AE; Woodruff PW; Spence SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 14620232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of self-awareness on body movement indicators of the intention to deceive.
    Lawson G; Stedmon AW; Zhang K; Eubanks DL; Frumkin LA
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 22877703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the implicit association test to a study on deception.
    Frost P; Adie M; Denomme R; Lahaie A; Sibley A; Smith E
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 20518438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction.
    Wagner-Altendorf TA; van der Lugt AH; Banfield JF; Meyer C; Rohrbach C; Heldmann M; Münte TF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():277. PubMed ID: 32765242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.
    Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.
    Langleben DD; Schroeder L; Maldjian JA; Gur RC; McDonald S; Ragland JD; O'Brien CP; Childress AR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 11848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
    Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and mouse dynamics.
    Monaro M; Gamberini L; Sartori G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177851. PubMed ID: 28542248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.