These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20702866)

  • 41. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception.
    Hu X; Chen H; Fu G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():488. PubMed ID: 23162520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Frye test in "lie detection" (42:226-233, 2014).
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4):533. PubMed ID: 25492080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lying relies on the truth.
    Debey E; De Houwer J; Verschuere B
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 24859237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
    Perillo JT; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.
    Knieps M; Granhag PA; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():677. PubMed ID: 25071648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.
    Kleinberg B; Mozes M; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):714-723. PubMed ID: 28940300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.
    Seth AK; Iversen JR; Edelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):465-76. PubMed ID: 16678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans.
    Spence SA; Farrow TF; Herford AE; Wilkinson ID; Zheng Y; Woodruff PW
    Neuroreport; 2001 Sep; 12(13):2849-53. PubMed ID: 11588589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling.
    Ito A; Abe N; Fujii T; Hayashi A; Ueno A; Mugikura S; Takahashi S; Mori E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():43-52. PubMed ID: 22580084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 15008651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.
    Van Bockstaele B; Wilhelm C; Meijer E; Debey E; Verschuere B
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1666. PubMed ID: 26579047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The truth about cognitive impairment in functional motor symptoms: An experimental deception study with the Guilty Knowledge Task.
    Demartini B; Ferrucci R; Goeta D; Ruggiero F; D'Agostino A; Priori A; Gambini O
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 64():174-179. PubMed ID: 30940452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Questions and deception: How to ask better questions and elicit the truth.
    VanEpps EM; Hart E
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Oct; 47():101383. PubMed ID: 35779451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The production and detection of deception in an interactive game.
    Sip KE; Lynge M; Wallentin M; McGregor WB; Frith CD; Roepstorff A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3619-26. PubMed ID: 20727906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.